Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Core-thickness decision inside Paddletek's Bantam line. Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 76Power85
- 85Control90
- 90Spin84
- 77Forgiveness88
- 76Sweet spot89
- 74Stability85
- 98Maneuverability84
- 79Pop84
- 85Touch88
- 79Consistency89
- 39Swing weight66
- 68Twist weight84
- 51Launch angle54
- 47Plow through74
- 82Softness86
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 specs
Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $105 — better | $200 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 79.4 | 86.3 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.65 | 7.7 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 12.7 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 93 | 105 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.2 | 6.9 — better |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 15.9375 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.375 |
| Surface | PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber | Textured carbon |
| Core material | Polymer Honeycomb | Bantam polymer core |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 verdict
At 7.65 oz this is the lightest paddle in the database, and the 12.7 mm core makes it faster still. It is a hands-speed specialist, not a power tool.
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is swing weight: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 66 against 39 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 — a 27-point gap. They are effectively level on touch, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 is $95 cheaper at $105.
Swing weight
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 27 points (66 vs 39).
Plow through
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 27 points (74 vs 47).
Twist weight
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 16 points (84 vs 68).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 leads by 14 points (98 vs 84).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the clearer pick at this level — sweet spot 89 vs 76, forgiveness 88 vs 77, twist weight 84 vs 68. Twist weight 6.9 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 85.4 on the weighted index). Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 and keep the $95.
- Forgiveness
- Power
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is a narrow pick at this level — plow through 74 vs 47, power 85 vs 76, control 90 vs 85. Swing weight 105 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Plow through
- Power
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 88 vs 77, twist weight 84 vs 68, softness 86 vs 82. Its 14 mm Bantam polymer core core at 7.7 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want swing weight (+27), plow through (+27), twist weight (+16). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 if you want maneuverability (+14), spin (+6). Its swing weight of 93 kg·cm² and 12.7 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 79.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 27 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 93 kg·cm² swing weight against 105 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 measures 85 on power against 76 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. That comes from a 14 mm Bantam polymer core core swinging at 105 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 90 versus 85. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 scores 90 for spin off its PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 6-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, with 6.9 twist weight against 6.2. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher forgiveness score (88) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 costs $105, $95 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core core with a Textured carbon face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7: 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core with a PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 5.25 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 at 7.65 oz against 7.7 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (93 vs 105) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads on swing weight by 27 points; everything else is within 27 points. At $200 vs $105, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
This matchup is a spin vs pop decision
Browse every head-to-head that splits on the same trade-off:
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Scorpeus 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Tenon
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Magnus 3S 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.