JOOLA Scorpeus 14 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Scorpeus 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (81.2 vs 79.4), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
Too close to call
76 vs 74
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Control
89 vs 85
Forgiveness
Too close to call
79 vs 77
Hand speed
93 vs 96 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$100 at IQ 81.2 vs $105 at IQ 79.4
Overall pick: JOOLA Scorpeus 14 · $100 · IQ 81.2
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 74Power76
- 89Control85
- 90Spin90
- 79Forgiveness77
- 78Sweet spot76
- 77Stability74
- 98Maneuverability98
- 76Pop79
- 88Touch85
- 82Consistency79
- 44Swing weight39
- 71Twist weight68
- 49Launch angle51
- 52Plow through47
- 85Softness82
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Scorpeus 14 | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $100 — better | $105 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 81.2 — better | 79.4 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.8 | 7.65 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 12.7 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 96 | 93 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.3 — better | 6.2 |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 15.9375 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 8 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.125 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Charged Carbon Surface Technology | PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber |
| Core material | Honeycomb Polypropylene Core | Polymer Honeycomb |
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 verdict
Anna Bright's standard-shape build puts the Perseus face on a 16.0 x 8.0 in body, which widens the sweet spot and speeds up the hands at the cost of reach.
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 verdict
At 7.65 oz this is the lightest paddle in the database, and the 12.7 mm core makes it faster still. It is a hands-speed specialist, not a power tool.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is swing weight: JOOLA Scorpeus 14 scores 44 against 39 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 — a 5-point gap. They are effectively level on stability, pop, touch, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($100 vs $105) that it should not break the tie.
Swing weight
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 leads by 5 points (44 vs 39).
Plow through
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 leads by 5 points (52 vs 47).
Control
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 leads by 4 points (89 vs 85).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
JOOLA Scorpeus 14
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 79 vs 77, sweet spot 78 vs 76, stability 77 vs 74. Twist weight 6.3 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Stability
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 85.4 on the weighted index). Pick on static weight — 7.8 oz on the Scorpeus 14, 7.65 oz on the Bantam ALW-C 12.7.
- Control
- Touch
- Forgiveness
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (80.9 vs 79.5 on the weighted index). Pick on static weight — 7.8 oz on the Scorpeus 14, 7.65 oz on the Bantam ALW-C 12.7.
- Plow through
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
JOOLA Scorpeus 14
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 85 vs 82, forgiveness 79 vs 77, twist weight 71 vs 68. Its 14 mm Honeycomb Polypropylene Core at 7.8 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Scorpeus 14
Take JOOLA Scorpeus 14 if you want swing weight (+5), plow through (+5), control (+4). Its swing weight of 96 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 if you prefer a 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core — it gives up nothing measurable to JOOLA Scorpeus 14.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 review →JOOLA Scorpeus 14 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (81.2 vs 79.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — JOOLA Scorpeus 14 leads by 5 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 93 kg·cm² swing weight against 96 for JOOLA Scorpeus 14. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 scores 76 for power against 74 for JOOLA Scorpeus 14. That comes from a 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core swinging at 93 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14 at 89 versus 85. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14, with the higher forgiveness score (79 vs 77). Its 6.3 twist weight against 6.2 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $5 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14: 14 mm Honeycomb Polypropylene Core with a Charged Carbon Surface Technology face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7: 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core with a PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.25 in handle.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 79 and sweet spot 78 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 at 7.65 oz against 7.8 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (93 vs 96) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 to the JOOLA Scorpeus 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Scorpeus 14 leads on swing weight by 5 points; everything else is within 5 points. At $100 vs $105, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Scorpeus 14 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Scorpeus 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Scorpeus 14 vs Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Scorpeus 14 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Scorpeus 14 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.