JOOLA Scorpeus 14 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 81.2), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
Too close to call
74 vs 71
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Control
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
94 vs 89
Forgiveness
Too close to call
82 vs 79
Hand speed
Too close to call
96 vs 98 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$100 at IQ 81.2 vs $333 at IQ 84.1
Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 · $333 · IQ 84.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 74Power71
- 89Control94
- 90Spin90
- 79Forgiveness82
- 78Sweet spot81
- 77Stability84
- 98Maneuverability97
- 76Pop70
- 88Touch92
- 82Consistency87
- 44Swing weight47
- 71Twist weight77
- 49Launch angle46
- 52Plow through59
- 85Softness90
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Scorpeus 14 | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $100 — better | $333 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 81.2 | 84.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 96 | 98 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.3 | 6.5 — better |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 15.95 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 8 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.6 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.125 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Charged Carbon Surface Technology | Multistrata T700 Carbon |
| Core material | Honeycomb Polypropylene Core | BoomCore™ |
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 verdict
Anna Bright's standard-shape build puts the Perseus face on a 16.0 x 8.0 in body, which widens the sweet spot and speeds up the hands at the cost of reach.
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 verdict
The widebody Boomstik keeps BoomCore's power but spreads it across a 15.95 x 8.0 in face, which is the most forgiving version of Selkirk's flagship platform.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is stability: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 scores 84 against 77 for JOOLA Scorpeus 14 — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on power, forgiveness, sweet spot, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Scorpeus 14 is $233 cheaper at $100.
Stability
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 7 points (84 vs 77).
Plow through
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 7 points (59 vs 52).
Pop
JOOLA Scorpeus 14 leads by 6 points (76 vs 70).
Twist weight
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 6 points (77 vs 71).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — stability 84 vs 77, twist weight 77 vs 71, consistency 87 vs 82. Twist weight 6.5 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Stability
- Twist weight
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 88.4 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Scorpeus 14 and keep the $233.
- Control
- Touch
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (80.9 vs 82.6 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Scorpeus 14 and keep the $233.
- Plow through
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 90 vs 85, twist weight 77 vs 71, forgiveness 82 vs 79. Its 16 mm BoomCore™ core at 8.2 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Scorpeus 14
Take JOOLA Scorpeus 14 if you want pop (+6). Its swing weight of 96 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 if you want stability (+7), plow through (+7), twist weight (+6). Its swing weight of 98 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 review →JOOLA Scorpeus 14 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 81.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — stability — Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 7 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14, at 96 kg·cm² swing weight against 98 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14 scores 74 for power against 71 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. That comes from a 14 mm Honeycomb Polypropylene Core swinging at 96 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 at 94 versus 89. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, with the higher forgiveness score (82 vs 79). Its 6.5 twist weight against 6.3 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14 costs $100, $233 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14: 14 mm Honeycomb Polypropylene Core with a Charged Carbon Surface Technology face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16: 16 mm BoomCore™ core with a Multistrata T700 Carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 5.6 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 82 and sweet spot 81 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Scorpeus 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Scorpeus 14 at 7.8 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (96 vs 98) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Scorpeus 14 to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads on stability by 7 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $100 vs $333, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Scorpeus 14 vs Perseus 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Coral Pro
- Scorpeus 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Scorpeus 14 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Scorpeus 14 vs Hyperion C2 CFS 16
- Scorpeus 14 vs Bantam ALW-C 12.7
- Scorpeus 14 vs SLK Halo XL Control
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Scorpeus 14 vs Bantam ALW-C 12.7
- Scorpeus 14 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Scorpeus 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Kinetic Pro Flight
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Scorpeus 14 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Scorpeus 14 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.