ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin, control and hand speed on Paddle DNA against the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight, which costs $200.
Power
Too close to call
72 vs 71
Spin
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
90 vs 86
Control
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
94 vs 90
Forgiveness
88 vs 82
Hand speed
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
98 vs 103 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$200 at IQ 83.5 vs $333 at IQ 84.1
Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 · $333 · IQ 84.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 72Power71
- 90Control94
- 86Spin90
- 88Forgiveness82
- 88Sweet spot81
- 78Stability84
- 92Maneuverability97
- 74Pop70
- 90Touch92
- 86Consistency87
- 52Swing weight47
- 74Twist weight77
- 60Launch angle46
- 64Plow through59
- 90Softness90
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 — better | $333 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 83.5 | 84.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 103 | 98 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6 | 6.5 — better |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 15.5 | 15.95 |
| Face width(in) | 7.6 | 8 |
| Handle length(in) | 5 | 5.6 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Carbon with Diamond Frost texture | Multistrata T700 Carbon |
| Core material | Cloud Cell poly honeycomb with Kinetic mass system | BoomCore™ |
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight verdict
The arm-comfort paddle. ProKennex's Kinetic mass system and the light 7.5 oz build make this the paddle we point players toward when elbow or shoulder pain is the limiting factor, not skill.
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 verdict
The widebody Boomstik keeps BoomCore's power but spreads it across a 15.95 x 8.0 in face, which is the most forgiving version of Selkirk's flagship platform.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is launch angle: ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight scores 60 against 46 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 — a 14-point gap. They are effectively level on twist weight, touch, power, so those traits should not decide the purchase. ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight is $133 cheaper at $200.
Launch angle
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight leads by 14 points (60 vs 46).
Sweet spot
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight leads by 7 points (88 vs 81).
Forgiveness
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight leads by 6 points (88 vs 82).
Stability
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 6 points (84 vs 78).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.2 vs 83 on the weighted index). Take ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight and keep the $133.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 88.4 on the weighted index). Take ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight and keep the $133.
- Maneuverability
- Control
- Spin
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (81.3 vs 82.6 on the weighted index). Take ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight and keep the $133.
- Spin
- Maneuverability
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.5 vs 85.5 on the weighted index). Take ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight and keep the $133.
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight
Take ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight if you want launch angle (+14), sweet spot (+7), forgiveness (+6). Its swing weight of 103 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 if you want stability (+6), maneuverability (+5), control (+4). Its swing weight of 98 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 review →ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 83.5), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — launch angle — ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight leads by 14 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 98 kg·cm² swing weight against 103 for ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight scores 72 for power against 71 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. That comes from a 14 mm Cloud Cell poly honeycomb with Kinetic mass system core swinging at 103 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 at 94 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 scores 90 for spin off its Multistrata T700 Carbon face, against 86 for the Carbon with Diamond Frost texture face on ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 82). Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 actually carries the higher twist weight (6.5 vs 6), but ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight makes it back on sweet spot (88) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight costs $200, $133 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight: 14 mm Cloud Cell poly honeycomb with Kinetic mass system core with a Carbon with Diamond Frost texture face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16: 16 mm BoomCore™ core with a Multistrata T700 Carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 5.6 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight at 7.5 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (103 vs 98) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight leads on launch angle by 14 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $200 vs $333, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Tempest Wave V3
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Black Ace LG
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Coral Pro
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Vanguard Control Air Invikta
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Pursuit MX 6.0
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Tempest Pro C 16
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Vision CGS 16
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Tempest Wave V3
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Essentials 16
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Encore Pro EX
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Prism Flash
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

