Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 82), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
77 vs 71
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Control
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
94 vs 89
Forgiveness
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
82 vs 77
Hand speed
Too close to call
98 vs 100 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
$130 at IQ 82 vs $333 at IQ 84.1
Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 · $333 · IQ 84.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 77Power71
- 89Control94
- 90Spin90
- 77Forgiveness82
- 75Sweet spot81
- 84Stability84
- 92Maneuverability97
- 76Pop70
- 88Touch92
- 83Consistency87
- 50Swing weight47
- 74Twist weight77
- 49Launch angle46
- 64Plow through59
- 85Softness90
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $130 — better | $333 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 82 | 84.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 100 | 98 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.4 | 6.5 — better |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 15.9 | 15.95 |
| Face width(in) | 7.85 | 8 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.6 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit | Multistrata T700 Carbon |
| Core material | Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System | BoomCore™ |
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 verdict
A titanium mesh layer under the Florek carbon face gives the 007 Epic a firmer, louder response than the rest of the Labs line, and it sells for a third of Boomstik money.
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 verdict
The widebody Boomstik keeps BoomCore's power but spreads it across a 15.95 x 8.0 in face, which is the most forgiving version of Selkirk's flagship platform.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is power: Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 scores 77 against 71 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 — a 6-point gap. They are effectively level on swing weight, twist weight, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 is $203 cheaper at $130.
Power
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 6 points (77 vs 71).
Sweet spot
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 6 points (81 vs 75).
Pop
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 6 points (76 vs 70).
Control
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 5 points (94 vs 89).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — sweet spot 81 vs 75, forgiveness 82 vs 77, consistency 87 vs 83. Twist weight 6.5 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — control 94 vs 89, maneuverability 97 vs 92, forgiveness 82 vs 77. At 98 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Control
- Maneuverability
- Forgiveness
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (82.8 vs 82.6 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 and keep the $203.
- Power
- Plow through
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 90 vs 85, forgiveness 82 vs 77, twist weight 77 vs 74. Its 16 mm BoomCore™ core at 8.2 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
Take Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 if you want power (+6), pop (+6), plow through (+5). Its swing weight of 100 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 if you want sweet spot (+6), control (+5), forgiveness (+5). Its swing weight of 98 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 review →Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 82), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — power — Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 6 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 98 kg·cm² swing weight against 100 for Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 scores 77 for power against 71 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. That comes from a 14 mm Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System core swinging at 100 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 at 94 versus 89. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, with the higher forgiveness score (82 vs 77). Its 6.5 twist weight against 6.4 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 costs $130, $203 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14: 14 mm Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System core with a Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16: 16 mm BoomCore™ core with a Multistrata T700 Carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 5.6 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 82 and sweet spot 81 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 at 8.2 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (98 vs 100) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads on power by 6 points; everything else is within 6 points. At $130 vs $333, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Labs Project 006
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Coral Pro
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Hyperion C2 CFS 16
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs R1 Pulsar
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Atlas 16
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs BALLR+ 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Kinetic Pro Flight
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.