Ronbus R1 Pulsar vs Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Ronbus R1 Pulsar takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 78Power77
- 92Control89
- 88Spin90
- 84Forgiveness77
- 84Sweet spot75
- 80Stability84
- 84Maneuverability92
- 70Pop76
- 90Touch88
- 86Consistency83
- 62Swing weight50
- 74Twist weight74
- 46Launch angle49
- 72Plow through64
- 84Softness85
Specs
| $120 | Price | $130 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 14 mm |
| 7.9 oz | Weight | 8.4 oz |
| 104 | Swing weight | 100 |
| 6.1 | Twist weight | 6.4 |
| elongated | Shape | standard |
| Raw Toray T700 carbon | Surface | Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit |
| 5.5 in | Handle | 5.25 in |
Ronbus R1 Pulsar verdict
The value benchmark for an elongated control paddle. It gives up thermoformed power, but the swing weight is low enough that fast hands stay fast into the third game.
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 verdict
A titanium mesh layer under the Florek carbon face gives the 007 Epic a firmer, louder response than the rest of the Labs line, and it sells for a third of Boomstik money.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is swing weight: Ronbus R1 Pulsar scores 62 against 50 for Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 — a 12-point gap. They are effectively level on control, consistency, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($120 vs $130) that it should not break the tie.
Swing weight
Ronbus R1 Pulsar leads by 12 points (62 vs 50).
Sweet spot
Ronbus R1 Pulsar leads by 9 points (84 vs 75).
Maneuverability
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 8 points (92 vs 84).
Plow through
Ronbus R1 Pulsar leads by 8 points (72 vs 64).
Which one should you buy?
Ronbus R1 Pulsar
Take Ronbus R1 Pulsar if you want swing weight (+12), sweet spot (+9), plow through (+8). Its swing weight of 104 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Ronbus R1 Pulsar review →Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
Take Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 if you want maneuverability (+8), pop (+6), stability (+4). Its swing weight of 100 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 review →Ronbus R1 Pulsar vs Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 FAQ
- Which is better, the Ronbus R1 Pulsar or the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (83.5 vs 82), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Ronbus R1 Pulsar leads by 12 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14, at 100 kg·cm² swing weight against 104 for Ronbus R1 Pulsar. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Ronbus R1 Pulsar or the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar measures 78 on power against 77 for Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14. That comes from a 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core swinging at 104 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar at 92 versus 89. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 scores 90 for spin off its Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit face, against 88 for the Raw Toray T700 carbon face on Ronbus R1 Pulsar. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14, with 6.4 twist weight against 6.1. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Ronbus R1 Pulsar carries the higher forgiveness score (84) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14: 14 mm Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System core with a Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Ronbus R1 Pulsar avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 84 and sweet spot 84 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Ronbus R1 Pulsar rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Ronbus R1 Pulsar at 7.9 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (104 vs 100) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 to the Ronbus R1 Pulsar?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Ronbus R1 Pulsar leads on swing weight by 12 points; everything else is within 9 points. At $120 vs $130, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- R1 Pulsar vs Sapphire 16
- R1 Pulsar vs Coral Hybrid 16
- R1 Pulsar vs BALLR+ 16
- R1 Pulsar vs Pursuit Ultra MX 6.0
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs BALLR+ 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Ronbus R1 Pulsar and Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.