JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16, which costs $120.
Power
Too close to call
77 vs 75
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Control
Too close to call
91 vs 89
Forgiveness
Too close to call
77 vs 75
Hand speed
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
100 vs 109 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$120 at IQ 78.4 vs $130 at IQ 82
Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 · $130 · IQ 82
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 75Power77
- 91Control89
- 90Spin90
- 75Forgiveness77
- 73Sweet spot75
- 69Stability84
- 84Maneuverability92
- 70Pop76
- 92Touch88
- 78Consistency83
- 64Swing weight50
- 56Twist weight74
- 46Launch angle49
- 72Plow through64
- 90Softness85
JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 | Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $120 — better | $130 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 78.4 | 82 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 109 | 100 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 5.8 | 6.4 — better |
| Shape | elongated | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 15.9 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.85 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.125 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Charged Carbon Surface Technology | Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit |
| Core material | Honeycomb Polypropylene Core | Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System |
JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 verdict
Simone Jardim's signature Hyperion is the softest-launching elongated JOOLA still in wide distribution, and it is now priced like a mid-tier paddle.
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 verdict
A titanium mesh layer under the Florek carbon face gives the 007 Epic a firmer, louder response than the rest of the Labs line, and it sells for a third of Boomstik money.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is twist weight: Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 scores 74 against 56 for JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 — an 18-point gap. They are effectively level on launch angle, power, control, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($130 vs $120) that it should not break the tie.
Twist weight
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 18 points (74 vs 56).
Stability
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 15 points (84 vs 69).
Swing weight
JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 leads by 14 points (64 vs 50).
Maneuverability
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 8 points (92 vs 84).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 is the clearer pick at this level — twist weight 74 vs 56, stability 84 vs 69, consistency 83 vs 78. Twist weight 6.4 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Twist weight
- Stability
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.9 vs 84.4 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Labs Project 007 Epic 14, elongated on the Hyperion C2 CFS 16.
- Maneuverability
- Consistency
- Forgiveness
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (82.8 vs 83.6 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Labs Project 007 Epic 14, elongated on the Hyperion C2 CFS 16.
- Plow through
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (80.8 vs 79.7 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Labs Project 007 Epic 14, elongated on the Hyperion C2 CFS 16.
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14
Take Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 if you want twist weight (+18), stability (+15), maneuverability (+8). Its swing weight of 100 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 review →JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16
Take JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 if you want swing weight (+14), plow through (+8), softness (+5). Its swing weight of 109 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 review →Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 or the JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (82 vs 78.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads by 18 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14, at 100 kg·cm² swing weight against 109 for JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 or the JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 scores 77 for power against 75 for JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16. That comes from a 14 mm Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System core swinging at 100 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 at 91 versus 89. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14, with the higher forgiveness score (77 vs 75). Its 6.4 twist weight against 5.8 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14: 14 mm Polypropylene Honeycomb with Patent Pending Titanium Mesh Layer System core with a Florek Carbon Face with InfiniGrit face. JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16: 16 mm Honeycomb Polypropylene Core with a Charged Carbon Surface Technology face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 77 and sweet spot 75 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 at 7.9 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (109 vs 100) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 to the Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 leads on twist weight by 18 points; everything else is within 15 points. At $130 vs $120, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Hyperion C2 CFS 16 vs GX2 Integra XL
- Hyperion C2 CFS 16 vs BALLR+ 16
- Hyperion C2 CFS 16 vs Perseus Pro IV 14
- Hyperion C2 CFS 16 vs V1100 16
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
- Labs Project 007 Epic 14 vs BALLR+ 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 and Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Hyperion C2 CFS 16 and Selkirk Labs Project 007 Epic 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.