Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Vatic Pro Atlas 16
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Vatic Pro Atlas 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 76Power78
- 85Control88
- 90Spin86
- 77Forgiveness90
- 76Sweet spot90
- 74Stability84
- 98Maneuverability82
- 79Pop74
- 85Touch86
- 79Consistency88
- 39Swing weight66
- 68Twist weight80
- 51Launch angle48
- 47Plow through74
- 82Softness82
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Vatic Pro Atlas 16 specs
Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 | Vatic Pro Atlas 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $105 — better | $110 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 79.4 | 84.8 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.65 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 12.7 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 93 | 106 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.2 | 6.7 — better |
| Shape | standard | widebody |
| Face length(in) | 15.9375 | 15.9 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 8.1 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.125 |
| Surface | PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber | Raw T700 carbon |
| Core material | Polymer Honeycomb | Polypropylene honeycomb |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 verdict
At 7.65 oz this is the lightest paddle in the database, and the 12.7 mm core makes it faster still. It is a hands-speed specialist, not a power tool.
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 verdict
The most forgiving paddle Vatic has shipped and still under $120. Sweet spot 90 and forgiveness 90 in an 8.1 in widebody is the profile most improving players actually need.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is swing weight: Vatic Pro Atlas 16 scores 66 against 39 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 — a 27-point gap. They are effectively level on control, launch angle, power, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($105 vs $110) that it should not break the tie.
Swing weight
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 leads by 27 points (66 vs 39).
Plow through
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 leads by 27 points (74 vs 47).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 leads by 16 points (98 vs 82).
Sweet spot
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 leads by 14 points (90 vs 76).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Vatic Pro Atlas 16
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 is the clearer pick at this level — sweet spot 90 vs 76, forgiveness 90 vs 77, twist weight 80 vs 68. Twist weight 6.7 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.4 vs 85.3 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Bantam ALW-C 12.7, widebody on the Atlas 16.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Vatic Pro Atlas 16
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 is a narrow pick at this level — plow through 74 vs 47, power 78 vs 76, control 88 vs 85. Swing weight 106 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Plow through
- Power
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Vatic Pro Atlas 16
Vatic Pro Atlas 16 is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 90 vs 77, twist weight 80 vs 68. Its 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core at 7.9 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 if you want maneuverability (+16), pop (+5), spin (+4). Its swing weight of 93 kg·cm² and 12.7 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 review →Vatic Pro Atlas 16
Take Vatic Pro Atlas 16 if you want swing weight (+27), plow through (+27), sweet spot (+14). Its swing weight of 106 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Vatic Pro Atlas 16 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Vatic Pro Atlas 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 or the Vatic Pro Atlas 16?
- Vatic Pro Atlas 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.8 vs 79.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Vatic Pro Atlas 16 leads by 27 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 93 kg·cm² swing weight against 106 for Vatic Pro Atlas 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 or the Vatic Pro Atlas 16?
- Vatic Pro Atlas 16 measures 78 on power against 76 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. That comes from a 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core swinging at 106 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Vatic Pro Atlas 16 at 88 versus 85. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 scores 90 for spin off its PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face, against 86 for the Raw T700 carbon face on Vatic Pro Atlas 16. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Vatic Pro Atlas 16, with 6.7 twist weight against 6.2. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Vatic Pro Atlas 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (90) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $5 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7: 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core with a PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face. Vatic Pro Atlas 16: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Vatic Pro Atlas 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 90 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Vatic Pro Atlas 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 at 7.65 oz against 7.9 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (93 vs 106) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 to the Vatic Pro Atlas 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Vatic Pro Atlas 16 leads on swing weight by 27 points; everything else is within 27 points. At $105 vs $110, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Scorpeus 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
- Atlas 16 vs Radius CGS 16
- Atlas 16 vs Crush Control 16
- Atlas 16 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Atlas 16 vs Sapphire 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 and Vatic Pro Atlas 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.