Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14
Bantam shoppers deciding between the power face and the all-court build. Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 85Power91
- 90Control79
- 84Spin83
- 88Forgiveness72
- 89Sweet spot74
- 85Stability80
- 84Maneuverability73
- 84Pop92
- 88Touch72
- 89Consistency78
- 66Swing weight74
- 84Twist weight71
- 54Launch angle54
- 74Plow through88
- 86Softness56
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 specs
Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 | Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 | $180 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.3 — better | 78.6 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 105 | 115 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.9 — better | 6 |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.375 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Textured carbon | Carbon fiber |
| Core material | Bantam polymer core | Bantam power core |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 verdict
A pure pop paddle. Counters come off the face faster than almost anything in the database, and the trade-off is a firm, chatty feel on soft shots.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is softness: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 86 against 56 for Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 — a 30-point gap. They are effectively level on spin, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 is $20 cheaper at $180.
Softness
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 30 points (86 vs 56).
Forgiveness
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 16 points (88 vs 72).
Touch
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 16 points (88 vs 72).
Sweet spot
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 15 points (89 vs 74).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 88 vs 72, sweet spot 89 vs 74, twist weight 84 vs 71. Twist weight 6.9 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 88 vs 72, touch 88 vs 72, control 90 vs 79. At 105 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Forgiveness
- Touch
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is a narrow pick at this level — touch 88 vs 72, maneuverability 84 vs 73, control 90 vs 79. Swing weight 105 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Touch
- Maneuverability
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 86 vs 56, forgiveness 88 vs 72, twist weight 84 vs 71. Its 14 mm Bantam polymer core core at 7.7 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 if you want plow through (+14), pop (+8), swing weight (+8). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want softness (+30), forgiveness (+16), touch (+16). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 78.6), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 30 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 115 for Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 measures 91 on power against 85 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. That comes from a 14 mm Bantam power core core swinging at 115 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 90 versus 79. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 84 for spin off its Textured carbon face, against 83 for the Carbon fiber face on Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, with 6.9 twist weight against 6. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher forgiveness score (88) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 costs $180, $20 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14: 14 mm Bantam power core core with a Carbon fiber face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core core with a Textured carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 7.7 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 115) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads on softness by 30 points; everything else is within 16 points. At $180 vs $200, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
This matchup is a control vs power decision
Browse every head-to-head that splits on the same trade-off:
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Tenon
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Magnus 3S 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs CX14H Ultimate Power
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Power Pro X 14
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Vanguard Power Air
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs CRBN-1X Power Series
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.