Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Ronbus Nova R1
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 85Power87
- 90Control89
- 84Spin88
- 88Forgiveness85
- 89Sweet spot86
- 85Stability87
- 84Maneuverability73
- 84Pop83
- 88Touch86
- 89Consistency87
- 66Swing weight79
- 84Twist weight84
- 54Launch angle57
- 74Plow through85
- 86Softness85
Specs
| $200 | Price | $160 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 7.7 oz | Weight | 8.1 oz |
| 105 | Swing weight | 116 |
| 6.9 | Twist weight | 6.4 |
| standard | Shape | elongated |
| Textured carbon | Surface | Raw T700 carbon |
| 5.25 in | Handle | 5.5 in |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
Ronbus Nova R1 verdict
Ronbus keeps doing the same thing: premium specs, mid-tier price. The Nova R1 lands between a control and power build and does not embarrass itself in either direction.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is swing weight: Ronbus Nova R1 scores 79 against 66 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 — a 13-point gap. They are effectively level on forgiveness, sweet spot, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Ronbus Nova R1 is $40 cheaper at $160.
Swing weight
Ronbus Nova R1 leads by 13 points (79 vs 66).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 11 points (84 vs 73).
Plow through
Ronbus Nova R1 leads by 11 points (85 vs 74).
Spin
Ronbus Nova R1 leads by 4 points (88 vs 84).
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want maneuverability (+11). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →Ronbus Nova R1
Take Ronbus Nova R1 if you want swing weight (+13), plow through (+11), spin (+4). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Ronbus Nova R1 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Ronbus Nova R1 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Ronbus Nova R1?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 85.7), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Ronbus Nova R1 leads by 13 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for Ronbus Nova R1. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Ronbus Nova R1?
- Ronbus Nova R1 measures 87 on power against 85 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. That comes from a 16 mm Foam-perimeter polymer core swinging at 116 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 90 versus 89. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Ronbus Nova R1 scores 88 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, with 6.9 twist weight against 6.4. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher forgiveness score (88) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Ronbus Nova R1 costs $160, $40 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core core with a Textured carbon face. Ronbus Nova R1: 16 mm Foam-perimeter polymer core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Ronbus Nova R1, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Ronbus Nova R1 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Ronbus Nova R1 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 7.7 oz against 8.1 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Ronbus Nova R1 to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Ronbus Nova R1 leads on swing weight by 13 points; everything else is within 11 points. At $200 vs $160, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Magnus 3S 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Loco 16mm Standard
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Mach 1 Forza 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Pursuit MX 6.0
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and Ronbus Nova R1. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.