Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin and value on Paddle DNA against the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, which costs $200.
Power
Too close to call
85 vs 84
Spin
89 vs 84
Control
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Forgiveness
Too close to call
88 vs 87
Hand speed
Too close to call
105 vs 107 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$99 at IQ 85.8 vs $200 at IQ 86.3
Overall pick: Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 · $99 · IQ 85.8
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 85Power84
- 90Control90
- 84Spin89
- 88Forgiveness87
- 89Sweet spot87
- 85Stability84
- 84Maneuverability80
- 84Pop80
- 88Touch88
- 89Consistency88
- 66Swing weight68
- 84Twist weight82
- 54Launch angle55
- 74Plow through76
- 86Softness84
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 | Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 | $99 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.3 — better | 85.8 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.7 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 105 | 107 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.9 — better | 6.5 |
| Shape | standard | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 16.3 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.3 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.375 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Textured carbon | Raw T700 carbon |
| Core material | Bantam polymer core | Thermoformed polymer |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 verdict
The $99 paddle that keeps embarrassing $200 ones. The V-Sol Pro will not out-drive the foam flagships, but on control, spin and consistency it is genuinely competitive.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is spin: Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 scores 89 against 84 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 — a 5-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, swing weight, twist weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 is $101 cheaper at $99.
Spin
Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 leads by 5 points (89 vs 84).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 4 points (84 vs 80).
Pop
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 4 points (84 vs 80).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.5 vs 86.2 on the weighted index). Take Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 and keep the $101.
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 86.5 on the weighted index). Take Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 and keep the $101.
- Maneuverability
- Forgiveness
- Power
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84 vs 84.6 on the weighted index). Take Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 and keep the $101.
- Spin
- Plow through
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.2 vs 84.5 on the weighted index). Take Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 and keep the $101.
- Softness
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want maneuverability (+4), pop (+4). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16
Take Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 if you want spin (+5). Its swing weight of 107 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 85.8), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — spin — Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 leads by 5 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 107 for Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 85 for power against 84 for Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16. That comes from a 14 mm Bantam polymer core swinging at 105 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for control.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 scores 89 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 5-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 87). Its 6.9 twist weight against 6.5 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 costs $99, $101 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core with a Textured carbon face. Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16: 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16, at 5.3 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 7.7 oz against 7.9 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 107) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 leads on spin by 5 points; everything else is within 4 points. At $200 vs $99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- V-Sol Pro 16 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
- V-Sol Pro 16 vs Scorpeus Pro IV 16
- V-Sol Pro 16 vs Series Two Project Flash
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and Vatic Pro V-Sol Pro 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.