Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 83.8), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
80 vs 71
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 89
Control
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
94 vs 88
Forgiveness
Too close to call
84 vs 82
Hand speed
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
98 vs 112 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$100 at IQ 83.8 vs $333 at IQ 84.1
Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 · $333 · IQ 84.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 71Power80
- 94Control88
- 90Spin89
- 82Forgiveness84
- 81Sweet spot85
- 84Stability82
- 97Maneuverability78
- 70Pop78
- 92Touch86
- 87Consistency86
- 47Swing weight70
- 77Twist weight80
- 46Launch angle55
- 59Plow through76
- 90Softness80
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 | Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $333 | $100 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 84.1 — better | 83.8 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.2 | 8 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 98 | 112 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 — better | 6.2 |
| Shape | standard | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 15.95 | 16.4 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 7.4 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.6 | 5.75 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Multistrata T700 Carbon | Raw T700 carbon fiber |
| Core material | BoomCore™ | Rev-Core polymer honeycomb |
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 verdict
The widebody Boomstik keeps BoomCore's power but spreads it across a 15.95 x 8.0 in face, which is the most forgiving version of Selkirk's flagship platform.
Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control verdict
A $100 raw-carbon elongated with a 5.75 in handle — the cheapest credible paddle in the database for a two-handed backhand player who wants real spin.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is swing weight: Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control scores 70 against 47 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 — a 23-point gap. They are effectively level on twist weight, forgiveness, stability, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control is $233 cheaper at $100.
Swing weight
Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control leads by 23 points (70 vs 47).
Maneuverability
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 19 points (97 vs 78).
Plow through
Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control leads by 17 points (76 vs 59).
Softness
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 10 points (90 vs 80).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83 vs 83.9 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control and keep the $233.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 97 vs 78, control 94 vs 88, touch 92 vs 86. At 98 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Control
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (82.6 vs 83 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control and keep the $233.
- Plow through
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 90 vs 80. Its 16 mm BoomCore™ core at 8.2 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 if you want maneuverability (+19), softness (+10), control (+6). Its swing weight of 98 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 review →Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control
Take Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control if you want swing weight (+23), plow through (+17), power (+9). Its swing weight of 112 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 or the Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.1 vs 83.8), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control leads by 23 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 98 kg·cm² swing weight against 112 for Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 or the Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control?
- Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control scores 80 for power against 71 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. That comes from a 16 mm Rev-Core polymer honeycomb core swinging at 112 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 at 94 versus 88. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 scores 90 for spin off its Multistrata T700 Carbon face, against 89 for the Raw T700 carbon fiber face on Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control, with the higher forgiveness score (84 vs 82). Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 actually carries the higher twist weight (6.5 vs 6.2), but Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control makes it back on sweet spot (85) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control costs $100, $233 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16: 16 mm BoomCore™ core with a Multistrata T700 Carbon face. Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control: 16 mm Rev-Core polymer honeycomb core with a Raw T700 carbon fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control, at 5.75 in of handle against 5.6 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 84 and sweet spot 85 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control at 8 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (112 vs 98) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control leads on swing weight by 23 points; everything else is within 19 points. At $333 vs $100, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Coral Pro
- SLK Halo XL Control vs SLK Halo Control
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Luxx Control Air
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs GX2 Integra XL
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Quartz Control
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Vanguard Control Air Invikta
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Kinetic Pro Flight
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- SLK Halo XL Control vs Crush Control 16
- SLK Halo XL Control vs Pursuit Ultra MX 6.0
- SLK Halo XL Control vs Series Two Project Flash
- SLK Halo XL Control vs V7 Hybrid
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 and Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 and Selkirk SLK Halo XL Control. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

