Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Six Zero Quartz Control
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Six Zero Quartz Control takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Six Zero Quartz Control wins this matchup for most players: it takes power, forgiveness and value on Paddle DNA against the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, which costs $333.
Power
78 vs 71
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Control
Too close to call
94 vs 93
Forgiveness
91 vs 82
Hand speed
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
98 vs 108 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$190 at IQ 88 vs $333 at IQ 84.1
Overall pick: Six Zero Quartz Control · $190 · IQ 88
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 71Power78
- 94Control93
- 90Spin90
- 82Forgiveness91
- 81Sweet spot92
- 84Stability90
- 97Maneuverability82
- 70Pop72
- 92Touch92
- 87Consistency91
- 47Swing weight68
- 77Twist weight90
- 46Launch angle50
- 59Plow through72
- 90Softness89
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Six Zero Quartz Control specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 | Six Zero Quartz Control |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $333 | $190 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 84.1 | 88 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 98 | 108 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 | 7.2 — better |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 15.95 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 8 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.6 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Multistrata T700 Carbon | Raw carbon friction |
| Core material | BoomCore™ | Thermoformed polymer |
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 verdict
The widebody Boomstik keeps BoomCore's power but spreads it across a 15.95 x 8.0 in face, which is the most forgiving version of Selkirk's flagship platform.
Six Zero Quartz Control verdict
A control build in the Double Black Diamond tradition, only lighter and quicker. Twist weight and sweet spot are the standouts; power is deliberately mid-pack.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is swing weight: Six Zero Quartz Control scores 68 against 47 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 — a 21-point gap. They are effectively level on pop, control, softness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Six Zero Quartz Control is $143 cheaper at $190.
Swing weight
Six Zero Quartz Control leads by 21 points (68 vs 47).
Maneuverability
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 leads by 15 points (97 vs 82).
Twist weight
Six Zero Quartz Control leads by 13 points (90 vs 77).
Plow through
Six Zero Quartz Control leads by 13 points (72 vs 59).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Six Zero Quartz Control
Six Zero Quartz Control is the clearer pick at this level — sweet spot 92 vs 81, forgiveness 91 vs 82, twist weight 90 vs 77. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (88.4 vs 88 on the weighted index). Take Six Zero Quartz Control and keep the $143.
- Maneuverability
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (82.6 vs 84.2 on the weighted index). Take Six Zero Quartz Control and keep the $143.
- Plow through
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Six Zero Quartz Control
Six Zero Quartz Control is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 91 vs 82, twist weight 90 vs 77. Its 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core at 7.9 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 if you want maneuverability (+15). Its swing weight of 98 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 review →Six Zero Quartz Control
Take Six Zero Quartz Control if you want swing weight (+21), twist weight (+13), plow through (+13). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Quartz Control review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Six Zero Quartz Control FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 or the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Six Zero Quartz Control carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88 vs 84.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Six Zero Quartz Control leads by 21 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 98 kg·cm² swing weight against 108 for Six Zero Quartz Control. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 or the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Six Zero Quartz Control scores 78 for power against 71 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16. That comes from a 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core swinging at 108 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 at 94 versus 93. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Six Zero Quartz Control, with the higher forgiveness score (91 vs 82). Its 7.2 twist weight against 6.5 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Six Zero Quartz Control costs $190, $143 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16: 16 mm BoomCore™ core with a Multistrata T700 Carbon face. Six Zero Quartz Control: 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16, at 5.6 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Six Zero Quartz Control is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 91 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Six Zero Quartz Control at 7.9 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 98) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 to the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Six Zero Quartz Control leads on swing weight by 21 points; everything else is within 15 points. At $333 vs $190, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Coral Pro
- Quartz Control vs Ruby
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Luxx Control Air
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs GX2 Integra XL
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Vanguard Control Air Invikta
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Scorpeus 14
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Kinetic Pro Flight
- Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Quartz Control vs Radius CGS 16
- Quartz Control vs Sapphire 16
- Quartz Control vs Vision CGS 16
- Quartz Control vs Tempest Pro C 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 and Six Zero Quartz Control in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16 and Six Zero Quartz Control. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.