JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
The two elongated paddles advanced players shortlist when money is not the constraint. Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Both land on the same overall IQ score (87.1), so the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Too close to call. The two split the scored categories and land on the same overall Paddle IQ score (87.1), so take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at $240 and keep the $92.99000000000001.
Power
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
95 vs 84
Spin
Too close to call
91 vs 91
Control
95 vs 84
Forgiveness
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
88 vs 82
Hand speed
Too close to call
116 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$240 at IQ 87.1 vs $332.99 at IQ 87.1
Overall pick: Too close to call · both score IQ 87.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 84Power95
- 95Control84
- 91Spin91
- 82Forgiveness88
- 84Sweet spot89
- 88Stability92
- 74Maneuverability66
- 79Pop90
- 93Touch80
- 92Consistency85
- 72Swing weight82
- 86Twist weight92
- 52Launch angle58
- 83Plow through93
- 78Softness72
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $240 — better | $332.99 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.1 | 87.1 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.2 | 8.25 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 116 | 118 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.4 | 7.2 — better |
| Shape | hybrid | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.45 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit |
| Core material | Propulsion polymer | BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring |
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 verdict
The most complete tournament paddle in the database. Control numbers sit at the top of the field without giving up the drive speed you need to finish points.
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict
The highest power score in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is touch: JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 scores 93 against 80 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 — a 13-point gap. They are effectively level on spin, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 is $92.99000000000001 cheaper at $240.
Touch
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 13 points (93 vs 80).
Power
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 11 points (95 vs 84).
Control
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 11 points (95 vs 84).
Pop
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 11 points (90 vs 79).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 88 vs 82, sweet spot 89 vs 84, twist weight 92 vs 86. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 is a narrow pick at this level — control 95 vs 84, touch 93 vs 80, maneuverability 74 vs 66. At 116 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Control
- Touch
- Maneuverability
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.3 vs 86.9 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and keep the $92.99000000000001.
- Touch
- Control
- Maneuverability
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (80 vs 80.5 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and keep the $92.99000000000001.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want power (+11), pop (+11), swing weight (+10). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 if you want touch (+13), control (+11), maneuverability (+8). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both carry the same overall Paddle IQ score (87.1). The split is trait by trait — JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads on touch by 13 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, at 116 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 84 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at 95 versus 84. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 91 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 82). Its 7.2 twist weight against 6.4 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 costs $240, $92.99000000000001 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at 8.2 oz against 8.25 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (116 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth switching between the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 and the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads on touch by 13 points; everything else is within 11 points. At $332.99 vs $240, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
This matchup is a control vs power decision
Browse every head-to-head that splits on the same trade-off:
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus CFS 16 vs Perseus Pro V 16
- Perseus CFS 16 vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
- Perseus CFS 16 vs Scorpeus Pro IV 16
- Perseus CFS 16 vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Ultré Power 2
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Hyperion Pro V 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Labs 008 Project 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.