JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 vs Selkirk OMNI 16
The all-court Selkirk against JOOLA's flagship power paddle — control and hand speed versus raw drive. Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk OMNI 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk OMNI 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes power and forgiveness on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, which costs $240.
Power
89 vs 84
Spin
Too close to call
91 vs 88
Control
Too close to call
95 vs 92
Forgiveness
90 vs 82
Hand speed
Too close to call
115 vs 116 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$240 at IQ 87.1 vs $280 at IQ 88.7
Overall pick: Selkirk OMNI 16 · $280 · IQ 88.7
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 84Power89
- 95Control92
- 91Spin88
- 82Forgiveness90
- 84Sweet spot91
- 88Stability90
- 74Maneuverability74
- 79Pop84
- 93Touch90
- 92Consistency91
- 72Swing weight76
- 86Twist weight89
- 52Launch angle54
- 83Plow through85
- 78Softness86
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 vs Selkirk OMNI 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 | Selkirk OMNI 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $240 — better | $280 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.1 | 88.7 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 116 | 115 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.4 | 6.9 — better |
| Shape | hybrid | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.4 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | Raw carbon |
| Core material | Propulsion polymer | Full EVA foam core |
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 verdict
The most complete tournament paddle in the database. Control numbers sit at the top of the field without giving up the drive speed you need to finish points.
Selkirk OMNI 16 verdict
Selkirk's answer to the foam era, and the most balanced paddle they have built. The OMNI refuses to specialize: power and control both sit in the top decile, which is rare and expensive.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is forgiveness: Selkirk OMNI 16 scores 90 against 82 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 — an 8-point gap. They are effectively level on control, spin, touch, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 is $40 cheaper at $240.
Forgiveness
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 8 points (90 vs 82).
Softness
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 8 points (86 vs 78).
Sweet spot
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 7 points (91 vs 84).
Power
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 5 points (89 vs 84).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Selkirk OMNI 16
Selkirk OMNI 16 is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 90 vs 82, sweet spot 91 vs 84, twist weight 89 vs 86. Twist weight 6.9 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.2 vs 87 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and keep the $40.
- Forgiveness
- Power
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.8 vs 86.9 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and keep the $40.
- Spin
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Selkirk OMNI 16
Selkirk OMNI 16 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 86 vs 78, forgiveness 90 vs 82, twist weight 89 vs 86. Its 16 mm Full EVA foam core at 8.1 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk OMNI 16
Take Selkirk OMNI 16 if you want forgiveness (+8), softness (+8), sweet spot (+7). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk OMNI 16 review →JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 if you prefer a 16 mm Propulsion polymer core — it gives up nothing measurable to Selkirk OMNI 16.
Read the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 review →Selkirk OMNI 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk OMNI 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88.7 vs 87.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — forgiveness — Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 8 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, at 115 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk OMNI 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 scores 89 for power against 84 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. That comes from a 16 mm Full EVA foam core swinging at 115 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at 95 versus 92. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 scores 91 for spin off its Raw Toray T700 carbon face, against 88 for the Raw carbon face on Selkirk OMNI 16. In practice a 3-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, with the higher forgiveness score (90 vs 82). Its 6.9 twist weight against 6.4 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 costs $240, $40 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk OMNI 16: 16 mm Full EVA foam core with a Raw carbon face. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 at 8.1 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (115 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 to the Selkirk OMNI 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk OMNI 16 leads on forgiveness by 8 points; everything else is within 8 points. At $280 vs $240, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
This matchup is a control vs power decision
Browse every head-to-head that splits on the same trade-off:
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus CFS 16 vs Perseus Pro V 16
- Perseus CFS 16 vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
- Perseus CFS 16 vs Scorpeus Pro IV 16
- Perseus CFS 16 vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and Selkirk OMNI 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and Selkirk OMNI 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.