JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16

Magnus's wider face against the elongated flagship — forgiveness versus reach at similar money. Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Quick answer

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes forgiveness and hand speed on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, which costs $240.

Overall pick: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 · $230 · IQ 87.6

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 83Power84
  • 90Control95
  • 92Spin91
  • 89Forgiveness82
  • 91Sweet spot84
  • 88Stability88
  • 80Maneuverability74
  • 78Pop79
  • 89Touch93
  • 90Consistency92
  • 71Swing weight72
  • 88Twist weight86
  • 57Launch angle52
  • 76Plow through83
  • 83Softness78

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16.
SpecJOOLA Magnus 3S 16JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
Street price(USD)$230 — better$240
IQ score(/ 100)87.6 — better87.1
Weight(oz)88.2
Core thickness(mm)1616
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster110116
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable7 — better6.4
Shapestandardhybrid
Face length(in)1616.5
Face width(in)7.97.5
Handle length(in)5.255.5
Grip circumference(in)4.254.25
SurfaceRaw carbon frictionRaw Toray T700 carbon
Core materialPropulsion polymerPropulsion polymer

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 verdict

The widebody in the JOOLA range. Sweet spot and twist weight are the story here — it is the easiest premium JOOLA to hit clean, and hands battles are noticeably quicker.

JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 verdict

The most complete tournament paddle in the database. Control numbers sit at the top of the field without giving up the drive speed you need to finish points.

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is forgiveness: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 89 against 82 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on consistency, twist weight, power, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($230 vs $240) that it should not break the tie.

  • Forgiveness

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (89 vs 82).

  • Sweet spot

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (91 vs 84).

  • Plow through

    JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 7 points (83 vs 76).

  • Maneuverability

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 6 points (80 vs 74).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Narrow

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 89 vs 82, sweet spot 91 vs 84, twist weight 88 vs 86. Twist weight 7 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Forgiveness
  • Sweet spot
  • Twist weight
See the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.4 vs 87 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Magnus 3S 16, hybrid on the Perseus CFS 16.

  • Maneuverability
  • Forgiveness
  • Spin

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.2 vs 86.9 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Magnus 3S 16, hybrid on the Perseus CFS 16.

  • Plow through
  • Touch
  • Control

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Clear win

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 83 vs 78, forgiveness 89 vs 82, twist weight 88 vs 86. Its 16 mm Propulsion polymer core at 8 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.

  • Softness
  • Forgiveness
  • Twist weight
See the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

Which one should you buy?

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 if you want forgiveness (+7), sweet spot (+7), maneuverability (+6). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 review →

JOOLA Perseus CFS 16

Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 if you want plow through (+7), control (+5), touch (+4). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 review →

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 FAQ

Which is better, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.6 vs 87.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — forgiveness — JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 scores 84 for power against 83 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16. That comes from a 16 mm Propulsion polymer core swinging at 116 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at 95 versus 90.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw carbon friction face, against 91 for the Raw Toray T700 carbon face on JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, with the higher forgiveness score (89 vs 82). Its 7 twist weight against 6.4 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
Is the price difference worth it?
They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
Do they use the same core and face?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 at 8 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 to the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads on forgiveness by 7 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $230 vs $240, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

This matchup is a hand speed vs plow through decision

Browse every head-to-head that splits on the same trade-off:

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.