JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 83Power84
- 90Control95
- 92Spin91
- 89Forgiveness82
- 91Sweet spot84
- 88Stability88
- 80Maneuverability74
- 78Pop79
- 89Touch93
- 90Consistency92
- 71Swing weight72
- 88Twist weight86
- 57Launch angle52
- 76Plow through83
- 83Softness78
Specs
| $230 | Price | $240 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 8 oz | Weight | 8.2 oz |
| 110 | Swing weight | 116 |
| 7 | Twist weight | 6.4 |
| standard | Shape | hybrid |
| Raw carbon friction | Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon |
| 5.25 in | Handle | 5.5 in |
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 verdict
The widebody in the JOOLA range. Sweet spot and twist weight are the story here — it is the easiest premium JOOLA to hit clean, and hands battles are noticeably quicker.
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 verdict
The most complete tournament paddle we have measured. Control numbers sit at the top of the field without giving up the drive speed you need to finish points.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is forgiveness: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 89 against 82 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on consistency, twist weight, power, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($230 vs $240) that it should not break the tie.
Forgiveness
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (89 vs 82).
Sweet spot
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (91 vs 84).
Plow through
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 7 points (83 vs 76).
Maneuverability
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 6 points (80 vs 74).
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16
Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 if you want forgiveness (+7), sweet spot (+7), maneuverability (+6). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 review →JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 if you want plow through (+7), control (+5), touch (+4). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 review →JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.6 vs 87.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — forgiveness — JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 measures 84 on power against 83 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16. That comes from a 16 mm Propulsion polymer core swinging at 116 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at 95 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw carbon friction face, against 91 for the Raw Toray T700 carbon face on JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, with 7 twist weight against 6.4. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (89) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 at 8 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 to the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads on forgiveness by 7 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $230 vs $240, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Magnus 3S 16 vs TruFoam Genesis 2
- Magnus 3S 16 vs Bantam ALW-C 14
- Magnus 3S 16 vs CRBN-2X Square
- Magnus 3S 16 vs Quartz Control
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.