JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs Six Zero Quartz Control
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Six Zero Quartz Control takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 83Power78
- 90Control93
- 92Spin90
- 89Forgiveness91
- 91Sweet spot92
- 88Stability90
- 80Maneuverability82
- 78Pop72
- 89Touch92
- 90Consistency91
- 71Swing weight68
- 88Twist weight90
- 57Launch angle50
- 76Plow through72
- 83Softness89
Specs
| $230 | Price | $190 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 8 oz | Weight | 7.9 oz |
| 110 | Swing weight | 108 |
| 7 | Twist weight | 7.2 |
| standard | Shape | standard |
| Raw carbon friction | Surface | Raw carbon friction |
| 5.25 in | Handle | 5.25 in |
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 verdict
The widebody in the JOOLA range. Sweet spot and twist weight are the story here — it is the easiest premium JOOLA to hit clean, and hands battles are noticeably quicker.
Six Zero Quartz Control verdict
A control build in the Double Black Diamond tradition, only lighter and quicker. Twist weight and sweet spot are the standouts; power is deliberately mid-pack.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is launch angle: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 57 against 50 for Six Zero Quartz Control — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on control, touch, swing weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Six Zero Quartz Control is $40 cheaper at $190.
Launch angle
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (57 vs 50).
Pop
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 6 points (78 vs 72).
Softness
Six Zero Quartz Control leads by 6 points (89 vs 83).
Power
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 5 points (83 vs 78).
Which one should you buy?
Six Zero Quartz Control
Take Six Zero Quartz Control if you want softness (+6). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Quartz Control review →JOOLA Magnus 3S 16
Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 if you want launch angle (+7), pop (+6), power (+5). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 review →Six Zero Quartz Control vs JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Six Zero Quartz Control or the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
- Six Zero Quartz Control carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88 vs 87.6), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — launch angle — JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Six Zero Quartz Control, at 108 kg·cm² swing weight against 110 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Six Zero Quartz Control or the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 measures 83 on power against 78 for Six Zero Quartz Control. That comes from a 16 mm Propulsion polymer core swinging at 110 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Six Zero Quartz Control at 93 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw carbon friction face, against 90 for the Raw carbon friction face on Six Zero Quartz Control. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Six Zero Quartz Control, with 7.2 twist weight against 7. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Six Zero Quartz Control carries the higher forgiveness score (91) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Six Zero Quartz Control costs $190, $40 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Six Zero Quartz Control: 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Six Zero Quartz Control, at 5.25 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Six Zero Quartz Control is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 91 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Six Zero Quartz Control at 7.9 oz against 8 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 110) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 to the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads on launch angle by 7 points; everything else is within 6 points. At $190 vs $230, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Quartz Control vs Double Black Diamond Control
- Quartz Control vs Pursuit MX 6.0
- Quartz Control vs Bantam ALW-C 14
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and Six Zero Quartz Control. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.