JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 83Power83
- 90Control92
- 92Spin92
- 89Forgiveness79
- 91Sweet spot79
- 88Stability71
- 80Maneuverability87
- 78Pop75
- 89Touch92
- 90Consistency81
- 71Swing weight58
- 88Twist weight56
- 57Launch angle50
- 76Plow through69
- 83Softness84
Specs
| $230 | Price | $220 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 8 oz | Weight | 8.15 oz |
| 110 | Swing weight | 105 |
| 7 | Twist weight | 5.8 |
| standard | Shape | hybrid |
| Raw carbon friction | Surface | Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber |
| 5.25 in | Handle | 5.5 in |
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 verdict
The widebody in the JOOLA range. Sweet spot and twist weight are the story here — it is the easiest premium JOOLA to hit clean, and hands battles are noticeably quicker.
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A verdict
The UPA-A revision brings the Coral Pro under the new pro-tour surface limits. It is measurably tamer than the original Coral Pro, and it is the version that is tournament-legal going forward.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is twist weight: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 88 against 56 for Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A — a 32-point gap. They are effectively level on pop, touch, control, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($230 vs $220) that it should not break the tie.
Twist weight
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 32 points (88 vs 56).
Stability
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 17 points (88 vs 71).
Swing weight
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 13 points (71 vs 58).
Sweet spot
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 12 points (91 vs 79).
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16
Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 if you want twist weight (+32), stability (+17), swing weight (+13). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 review →Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
Take Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A if you want maneuverability (+7). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A review →JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.6 vs 81.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 32 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 110 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 measures 83 on power against 83 for Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. That comes from a 16 mm Propulsion polymer core swinging at 110 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A at 92 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw carbon friction face, against 92 for the Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face on Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. In practice a 0-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, with 7 twist weight against 5.8. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (89) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A: 16 mm ProPulsion Foam core with a Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 at 8 oz against 8.15 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 105) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A to the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads on twist weight by 32 points; everything else is within 17 points. At $230 vs $220, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Magnus 3S 16 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Magnus 3S 16 vs Tenon
- Magnus 3S 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
- Magnus 3S 16 vs Coral Pro
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Coral Hybrid 16
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs BALLR+ 16
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Hyperion C2 CFS 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.