JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs Proton Series Two Project Flash

Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Proton Series Two Project Flash

Proton

Series Two Project Flash

85$200
Full review →

Quick answer

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (87.6 vs 85.3), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.

  • Power

    Too close to call

    84 vs 83

  • Spin

    Too close to call

    92 vs 92

  • Control

    Too close to call

    90 vs 88

  • Forgiveness

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

    89 vs 84

  • Hand speed

    Too close to call

    110 vs 111 kg·cm² swing weight

  • Value

    Proton Series Two Project Flash

    $200 at IQ 85.3 vs $230 at IQ 87.6

Overall pick: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 · $230 · IQ 87.6

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 83Power84
  • 90Control88
  • 92Spin92
  • 89Forgiveness84
  • 91Sweet spot86
  • 88Stability84
  • 80Maneuverability80
  • 78Pop80
  • 89Touch86
  • 90Consistency88
  • 71Swing weight70
  • 88Twist weight80
  • 57Launch angle50
  • 76Plow through80
  • 83Softness80

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs Proton Series Two Project Flash specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and the Proton Series Two Project Flash.
SpecJOOLA Magnus 3S 16Proton Series Two Project Flash
Street price(USD)$230$200 — better
IQ score(/ 100)87.6 — better85.3
Weight(oz)88
Core thickness(mm)1616
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster110111
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable7 — better6.7
Shapestandardhybrid
Face length(in)1616.3
Face width(in)7.97.6
Handle length(in)5.255.4
Grip circumference(in)4.254.25
SurfaceRaw carbon frictionGritted raw carbon
Core materialPropulsion polymerThermoformed polymer honeycomb

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 verdict

The widebody in the JOOLA range. Sweet spot and twist weight are the story here — it is the easiest premium JOOLA to hit clean, and hands battles are noticeably quicker.

Proton Series Two Project Flash verdict

The grittiest face Proton has made. Spin 92 puts it in the top tier of the database, and the hybrid shape keeps it usable at the kitchen line.

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is twist weight: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 scores 88 against 80 for Proton Series Two Project Flash — an 8-point gap. They are effectively level on touch, softness, control, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Proton Series Two Project Flash is $30 cheaper at $200.

  • Twist weight

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 8 points (88 vs 80).

  • Launch angle

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (57 vs 50).

  • Forgiveness

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 5 points (89 vs 84).

  • Sweet spot

    JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 5 points (91 vs 86).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Narrow

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 88 vs 80, forgiveness 89 vs 84, sweet spot 91 vs 86. Twist weight 7 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Twist weight
  • Forgiveness
  • Sweet spot
See the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 87.4 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Two Project Flash and keep the $30.

  • Forgiveness
  • Touch
  • Control

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.3 vs 85.2 on the weighted index). Take Proton Series Two Project Flash and keep the $30.

  • Plow through
  • Power

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Narrow

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 83 vs 80, twist weight 88 vs 80, forgiveness 89 vs 84. Its 16 mm Propulsion polymer core at 8 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.

  • Softness
  • Twist weight
  • Forgiveness
See the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

Which one should you buy?

Proton Series Two Project Flash

Take Proton Series Two Project Flash if you want plow through (+4). Its swing weight of 111 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Proton Series Two Project Flash review →

JOOLA Magnus 3S 16

Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 if you want twist weight (+8), launch angle (+7), forgiveness (+5). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 review →

Proton Series Two Project Flash vs JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 FAQ

Which is better, the Proton Series Two Project Flash or the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.6 vs 85.3), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 8 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 111 for Proton Series Two Project Flash. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the Proton Series Two Project Flash or the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
Proton Series Two Project Flash scores 84 for power against 83 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16. That comes from a 16 mm Thermoformed polymer honeycomb core swinging at 111 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 at 90 versus 88. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 92 for spin.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, with the higher forgiveness score (89 vs 84). Its 7 twist weight against 6.7 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
Is the price difference worth it?
Proton Series Two Project Flash costs $200, $30 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
Proton Series Two Project Flash: 16 mm Thermoformed polymer honeycomb core with a Gritted raw carbon face. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
Proton Series Two Project Flash, at 5.4 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
Which one is better for beginners?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Proton Series Two Project Flash rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both are listed at 8 oz, though swing weight differs (111 vs 110) and that is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Proton Series Two Project Flash to the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads on twist weight by 8 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $200 vs $230, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and Proton Series Two Project Flash in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and Proton Series Two Project Flash. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.