Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Six Zero Sapphire 16
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 85Power80
- 90Control93
- 84Spin91
- 88Forgiveness86
- 89Sweet spot88
- 85Stability84
- 84Maneuverability80
- 84Pop72
- 88Touch91
- 89Consistency88
- 66Swing weight64
- 84Twist weight82
- 54Launch angle48
- 74Plow through76
- 86Softness86
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Six Zero Sapphire 16 specs
Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 | Six Zero Sapphire 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 | $190 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.3 — better | 85.9 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 105 | 106 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.9 — better | 6.7 |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.375 | 4.125 |
| Surface | Textured carbon | Toray T700 raw carbon |
| Core material | Bantam polymer core | Gen 3 foam-injected polypropylene |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
Six Zero Sapphire 16 verdict
Six Zero's standard-shape Gen 3 build. It trades the Coral Pro's reach for a wider face, and the result is one of the most forgiving control paddles in the $200 bracket.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is pop: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 84 against 72 for Six Zero Sapphire 16 — a 12-point gap. They are effectively level on control, touch, forgiveness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($200 vs $190) that it should not break the tie.
Pop
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 12 points (84 vs 72).
Spin
Six Zero Sapphire 16 leads by 7 points (91 vs 84).
Launch angle
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 6 points (54 vs 48).
Power
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 5 points (85 vs 80).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.5 vs 86.4 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Bantam ALW-C 14, standard on the Sapphire 16.
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 87.1 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Bantam ALW-C 14, standard on the Sapphire 16.
- Spin
- Control
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84 vs 85.1 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Bantam ALW-C 14, standard on the Sapphire 16.
- Spin
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.2 vs 85.3 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Bantam ALW-C 14, standard on the Sapphire 16.
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want pop (+12), launch angle (+6), power (+5). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →Six Zero Sapphire 16
Take Six Zero Sapphire 16 if you want spin (+7). Its swing weight of 106 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Sapphire 16 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Six Zero Sapphire 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Six Zero Sapphire 16?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 85.9), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 12 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 106 for Six Zero Sapphire 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the Six Zero Sapphire 16?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 measures 85 on power against 80 for Six Zero Sapphire 16. That comes from a 14 mm Bantam polymer core core swinging at 105 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Six Zero Sapphire 16 at 93 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Six Zero Sapphire 16 scores 91 for spin off its Toray T700 raw carbon face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 7-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, with 6.9 twist weight against 6.7. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher forgiveness score (88) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core core with a Textured carbon face. Six Zero Sapphire 16: 16 mm Gen 3 foam-injected polypropylene core with a Toray T700 raw carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 7.7 oz against 8.1 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 106) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Six Zero Sapphire 16 to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads on pop by 12 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $200 vs $190, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Tenon
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Magnus 3S 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
- Sapphire 16 vs Radius CGS 16
- Sapphire 16 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Sapphire 16 vs R1 Pulsar
- Sapphire 16 vs Quartz Control
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and Six Zero Sapphire 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.