Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 wins this matchup for most players: it takes power on Paddle DNA against the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight, which costs $200.
Power
85 vs 72
Spin
Too close to call
86 vs 84
Control
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Forgiveness
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Hand speed
Too close to call
103 vs 105 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$200 at IQ 86.3 vs $200 at IQ 83.5
Overall pick: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 · $200 · IQ 86.3
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 85Power72
- 90Control90
- 84Spin86
- 88Forgiveness88
- 89Sweet spot88
- 85Stability78
- 84Maneuverability92
- 84Pop74
- 88Touch90
- 89Consistency86
- 66Swing weight52
- 84Twist weight74
- 54Launch angle60
- 74Plow through64
- 86Softness90
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 | ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 | $200 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.3 — better | 83.5 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.7 | 7.5 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 105 | 103 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.9 — better | 6 |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 15.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.375 | 4 |
| Surface | Textured carbon | Carbon with Diamond Frost texture |
| Core material | Bantam polymer core | Cloud Cell poly honeycomb with Kinetic mass system |
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight verdict
The arm-comfort paddle. ProKennex's Kinetic mass system and the light 7.5 oz build make this the paddle we point players toward when elbow or shoulder pain is the limiting factor, not skill.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is swing weight: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 66 against 52 for ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight — a 14-point gap. They are effectively level on consistency, spin, touch, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Both sell for $200, so price cannot break the tie.
Swing weight
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 14 points (66 vs 52).
Power
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 13 points (85 vs 72).
Pop
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 10 points (84 vs 74).
Twist weight
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 10 points (84 vs 74).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 84 vs 74, stability 85 vs 78, consistency 89 vs 86. Twist weight 6.9 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Twist weight
- Stability
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 86.7 on the weighted index). Pick on handle length — 5.25 in on the Bantam ALW-C 14, 5 in on the Kinetic Pro Flight.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is a narrow pick at this level — power 85 vs 72, plow through 74 vs 64. Swing weight 105 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Power
- Plow through
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.2 vs 86.5 on the weighted index). Pick on handle length — 5.25 in on the Bantam ALW-C 14, 5 in on the Kinetic Pro Flight.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want swing weight (+14), power (+13), pop (+10). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight
Take ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight if you want maneuverability (+8), launch angle (+6), softness (+4). Its swing weight of 103 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 vs ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.3 vs 83.5), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 14 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight, at 103 kg·cm² swing weight against 105 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 or the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 85 for power against 72 for ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight. That comes from a 14 mm Bantam polymer core swinging at 105 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for control.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight scores 86 for spin off its Carbon with Diamond Frost texture face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 6.9 and 6.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Both list at $200. Too close to call — neither has an advantage here.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core with a Textured carbon face. ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight: 14 mm Cloud Cell poly honeycomb with Kinetic mass system core with a Carbon with Diamond Frost texture face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight at 7.5 oz against 7.7 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (103 vs 105) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight to the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads on swing weight by 14 points; everything else is within 13 points. At $200 vs $200, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Tenon
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Vision CGS 16
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Tempest Wave V3
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Essentials 16
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Encore Pro EX
- Kinetic Pro Flight vs Prism Flash
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and ProKennex Kinetic Pro Flight. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.