JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7

Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16

JOOLA

Perseus Pro V 16

89$300
Full review →
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7

Paddletek

Bantam ALW-C 12.7

79$105
Full review →

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 88Power76
  • 96Control85
  • 92Spin90
  • 86Forgiveness77
  • 88Sweet spot76
  • 90Stability74
  • 73Maneuverability98
  • 80Pop79
  • 94Touch85
  • 93Consistency79
  • 74Swing weight39
  • 88Twist weight68
  • 51Launch angle51
  • 86Plow through47
  • 80Softness82

Specs

Specification comparison
$300Price$105
16 mmCore12.7 mm
8.3 ozWeight7.65 oz
118Swing weight93
6.7Twist weight6.2
hybridShapestandard
Raw Toray T700 carbonSurfacePT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber
5.5 inHandle5.25 in

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 verdict

The 2026 control flagship. The KineticFrame build stiffens the perimeter without adding face pop, so resets land shorter and drives stay predictable — at the highest price in the database.

Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 verdict

At 7.65 oz this is the lightest paddle in the database, and the 12.7 mm core makes it faster still. It is a hands-speed specialist, not a power tool.

The verdict

Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is plow through: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 86 against 47 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 — a 39-point gap. They are effectively level on spin, softness, pop, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 is $195 cheaper at $105.

  • Plow through

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 39 points (86 vs 47).

  • Swing weight

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 35 points (74 vs 39).

  • Maneuverability

    Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 leads by 25 points (98 vs 73).

  • Twist weight

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 20 points (88 vs 68).

Which one should you buy?

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16

Take JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 if you want plow through (+39), swing weight (+35), twist weight (+20). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 review →

Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7

Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 if you want maneuverability (+25). Its swing weight of 93 kg·cm² and 12.7 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 review →

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 FAQ

Which is better, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (89.1 vs 79.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — plow through — JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 39 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 93 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 measures 88 on power against 76 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. That comes from a 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 at 96 versus 85. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw Toray T700 carbon face, against 90 for the PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, with 6.7 twist weight against 6.2. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (86) as a result.
Is the price difference worth it?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 costs $105, $195 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16: 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7: 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core with a PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 at 7.65 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (93 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 to the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads on plow through by 39 points; everything else is within 35 points. At $300 vs $105, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.