JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (89.1 vs 87.6), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
88 vs 83
Spin
Too close to call
92 vs 92
Control
96 vs 90
Forgiveness
Too close to call
89 vs 86
Hand speed
110 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$230 at IQ 87.6 vs $300 at IQ 89.1
Overall pick: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 · $300 · IQ 89.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 83Power88
- 90Control96
- 92Spin92
- 89Forgiveness86
- 91Sweet spot88
- 88Stability90
- 80Maneuverability73
- 78Pop80
- 89Touch94
- 90Consistency93
- 71Swing weight74
- 88Twist weight88
- 57Launch angle51
- 76Plow through86
- 83Softness80
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 | JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $230 — better | $300 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.6 | 89.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8 | 8.3 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 110 | 118 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 7 — better | 6.7 |
| Shape | standard | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw carbon friction | Raw Toray T700 carbon |
| Core material | Propulsion polymer | KineticFrame foam-injected polymer |
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 verdict
The widebody in the JOOLA range. Sweet spot and twist weight are the story here — it is the easiest premium JOOLA to hit clean, and hands battles are noticeably quicker.
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 verdict
The 2026 control flagship. The KineticFrame build stiffens the perimeter without adding face pop, so resets land shorter and drives stay predictable — at the highest price in the database.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is plow through: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 86 against 76 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 — a 10-point gap. They are effectively level on forgiveness, sweet spot, consistency, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is $70 cheaper at $230.
Plow through
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 10 points (86 vs 76).
Maneuverability
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 7 points (80 vs 73).
Control
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 6 points (96 vs 90).
Launch angle
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 leads by 6 points (57 vs 51).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (89.4 vs 89.2 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and keep the $70.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.4 vs 88.4 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and keep the $70.
- Control
- Power
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is a narrow pick at this level — plow through 86 vs 76, power 88 vs 83, touch 94 vs 89. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Plow through
- Power
- Touch
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 83 vs 80, forgiveness 89 vs 86. Its 16 mm Propulsion polymer core at 8 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Magnus 3S 16
Take JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 if you want maneuverability (+7), launch angle (+6). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 review →JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
Take JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 if you want plow through (+10), control (+6), power (+5). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 review →JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 vs JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (89.1 vs 87.6), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — plow through — JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 10 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 or the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 88 for power against 83 for JOOLA Magnus 3S 16. That comes from a 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 at 96 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 92 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16, with the higher forgiveness score (89 vs 86). Its 7 twist weight against 6.7 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 costs $230, $70 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16: 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 89 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 at 8 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 to the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads on plow through by 10 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $230 vs $300, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Magnus 3S 16 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Magnus 3S 16 vs Tenon
- Magnus 3S 16 vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
- Magnus 3S 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus CFS 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Pro Ultimate Elongated 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus Pro IV 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Magnus 3S 16 and JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.