CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 wins this matchup for most players: it takes control, hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid, which costs $270.
Power
90 vs 85
Spin
90 vs 84
Control
90 vs 86
Forgiveness
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Hand speed
105 vs 115 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$200 at IQ 86.3 vs $270 at IQ 86.9
Overall pick: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 · $200 · IQ 86.3
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 90Power85
- 86Control90
- 90Spin84
- 88Forgiveness88
- 90Sweet spot89
- 90Stability85
- 74Maneuverability84
- 86Pop84
- 82Touch88
- 86Consistency89
- 76Swing weight66
- 88Twist weight84
- 56Launch angle54
- 88Plow through74
- 70Softness86
CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $270 | $200 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.9 — better | 86.3 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 7.7 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 115 | 105 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 7 — better | 6.9 |
| Shape | hybrid | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16.3 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.375 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon | Textured carbon |
| Core material | Full TruFoam injected core | Bantam polymer core |
CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid verdict
The widest sweet-spot score in the TruFoam line. Twist weight 88 with sweet spot 90 means off-center contact barely changes the ball, which is why foam paddles keep winning tournaments.
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 verdict
The lightweight Bantam. At 7.7 oz it is one of the fastest paddles in the database through hands battles, and Paddletek's core keeps the feel soft rather than tinny.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 scores 86 against 70 for CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on consistency, pop, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is $70 cheaper at $200.
Softness
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 16 points (86 vs 70).
Plow through
CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid leads by 14 points (88 vs 74).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 10 points (84 vs 74).
Swing weight
CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid leads by 10 points (76 vs 66).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (88.3 vs 87.5 on the weighted index). Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and keep the $70.
- Stability
- Twist weight
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.9 vs 86.7 on the weighted index). Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and keep the $70.
- Maneuverability
- Touch
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.8 vs 84 on the weighted index). Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 and keep the $70.
- Plow through
- Spin
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 86 vs 70. Its 14 mm Bantam polymer core at 7.7 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid
Take CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid if you want plow through (+14), swing weight (+10), spin (+6). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 if you want softness (+16), maneuverability (+10), touch (+6). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 review →CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 FAQ
- Which is better, the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.9 vs 86.3), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads by 16 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 115 for CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14?
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid scores 90 for power against 85 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. That comes from a 14 mm Full TruFoam injected core swinging at 115 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 90 versus 86. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid scores 90 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 84 for the Textured carbon face on Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. In practice a 6-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 7 and 6.9.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 costs $200, $70 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid: 14 mm Full TruFoam injected core with a Raw T700 carbon face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14: 14 mm Bantam polymer core with a Textured carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 90 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 at 7.7 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 115) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 to the CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 leads on softness by 16 points; everything else is within 14 points. At $270 vs $200, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Mod TA-15 3S 16
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Coral Pro
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Bantam ALW-C 12.7
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Bantam TKO-C 14
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs TruFoam Genesis X
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Agassi Pro 16
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs TruFoam Genesis 3
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs 1X TruFoam Power
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Labs 008 Project 16
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Mach 2 Forza 16
- CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid vs Agassi Pro 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs V-Sol Pro 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Tenon
- Bantam ALW-C 14 vs Vision CGS 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.