Ronbus Tenon vs Six Zero Quartz Control
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Six Zero Quartz Control takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Quick answer
Ronbus Tenon wins this matchup for most players: it takes power on Paddle DNA against the Six Zero Quartz Control, which costs $190.
Power
88 vs 78
Spin
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Control
Too close to call
93 vs 91
Forgiveness
Too close to call
91 vs 88
Hand speed
Too close to call
108 vs 110 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$180 at IQ 87.8 vs $190 at IQ 88
Overall pick: Ronbus Tenon · $180 · IQ 87.8
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 88Power78
- 91Control93
- 90Spin90
- 88Forgiveness91
- 89Sweet spot92
- 88Stability90
- 78Maneuverability82
- 83Pop72
- 89Touch92
- 90Consistency91
- 72Swing weight68
- 86Twist weight90
- 54Launch angle50
- 82Plow through72
- 85Softness89
Ronbus Tenon vs Six Zero Quartz Control specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Ronbus Tenon | Six Zero Quartz Control |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $180 — better | $190 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.8 | 88 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 110 | 108 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.7 | 7.2 — better |
| Shape | hybrid | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16.3 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 7.6 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon | Raw carbon friction |
| Core material | Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer | Thermoformed polymer |
Ronbus Tenon verdict
Ronbus doing what Ronbus does: a flagship-tier build at a mid-tier price. The Tenon lands closest to the premium all-court paddles on scored traits while costing about $100 less.
Six Zero Quartz Control verdict
A control build in the Double Black Diamond tradition, only lighter and quicker. Twist weight and sweet spot are the standouts; power is deliberately mid-pack.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is pop: Ronbus Tenon scores 83 against 72 for Six Zero Quartz Control — an 11-point gap. They are effectively level on forgiveness, sweet spot, touch, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($180 vs $190) that it should not break the tie.
Pop
Ronbus Tenon leads by 11 points (83 vs 72).
Power
Ronbus Tenon leads by 10 points (88 vs 78).
Plow through
Ronbus Tenon leads by 10 points (82 vs 72).
Maneuverability
Six Zero Quartz Control leads by 4 points (82 vs 78).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Six Zero Quartz Control
Six Zero Quartz Control is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 91 vs 88, sweet spot 92 vs 89, twist weight 90 vs 86. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.4 vs 88 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — hybrid on the Tenon, standard on the Quartz Control.
- Maneuverability
- Forgiveness
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Ronbus Tenon
Ronbus Tenon is a narrow pick at this level — power 88 vs 78, plow through 82 vs 72. Swing weight 110 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Power
- Plow through
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Six Zero Quartz Control
Six Zero Quartz Control is a narrow pick at this level — softness 89 vs 85, forgiveness 91 vs 88, twist weight 90 vs 86. Its 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core at 7.9 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Ronbus Tenon
Take Ronbus Tenon if you want pop (+11), power (+10), plow through (+10). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Ronbus Tenon review →Six Zero Quartz Control
Take Six Zero Quartz Control if you want maneuverability (+4), twist weight (+4), softness (+4). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Quartz Control review →Where to Buy
Ronbus Tenon
Six Zero Quartz Control
Ronbus Tenon vs Six Zero Quartz Control FAQ
- Which is better, the Ronbus Tenon or the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Six Zero Quartz Control carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88 vs 87.8), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — Ronbus Tenon leads by 11 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Six Zero Quartz Control, at 108 kg·cm² swing weight against 110 for Ronbus Tenon. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Ronbus Tenon or the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Ronbus Tenon scores 88 for power against 78 for Six Zero Quartz Control. That comes from a 16 mm Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer core swinging at 110 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Six Zero Quartz Control at 93 versus 91. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Six Zero Quartz Control, with the higher forgiveness score (91 vs 88). Its 7.2 twist weight against 6.7 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Ronbus Tenon: 16 mm Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer core with a Raw T700 carbon face. Six Zero Quartz Control: 16 mm Thermoformed polymer core with a Raw carbon friction face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Ronbus Tenon, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Ronbus Tenon avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Six Zero Quartz Control is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 91 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Ronbus Tenon rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Six Zero Quartz Control at 7.9 oz against 8 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 110) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Ronbus Tenon to the Six Zero Quartz Control?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Ronbus Tenon leads on pop by 11 points; everything else is within 10 points. At $180 vs $190, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Quartz Control vs Radius CGS 16
- Quartz Control vs Sapphire 16
- Quartz Control vs Vision CGS 16
- Quartz Control vs Tempest Pro C 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Ronbus Tenon and Six Zero Quartz Control in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Ronbus Tenon and Six Zero Quartz Control. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.