Ronbus Tenon vs Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Ronbus Tenon wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16, which costs $220.
Power
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Spin
94 vs 90
Control
Too close to call
91 vs 89
Forgiveness
Too close to call
90 vs 88
Hand speed
110 vs 116 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$180 at IQ 87.8 vs $220 at IQ 88.2
Overall pick: Ronbus Tenon · $180 · IQ 87.8
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 88Power88
- 91Control89
- 90Spin94
- 88Forgiveness90
- 89Sweet spot91
- 88Stability90
- 78Maneuverability70
- 83Pop84
- 89Touch86
- 90Consistency89
- 72Swing weight76
- 86Twist weight90
- 54Launch angle54
- 82Plow through86
- 85Softness78
Ronbus Tenon vs Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Ronbus Tenon | Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $180 — better | $220 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.8 | 88.2 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 110 | 116 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.7 | 7 — better |
| Shape | hybrid | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.3 | 16.3 |
| Face width(in) | 7.6 | 7.7 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.125 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon | Aramid fiber |
| Core material | Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer | Thermoformed honeycomb polymer with foam edgewalls |
Ronbus Tenon verdict
Ronbus doing what Ronbus does: a flagship-tier build at a mid-tier price. The Tenon lands closest to the premium all-court paddles on scored traits while costing about $100 less.
Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 verdict
The edgeless Ruby. Removing the edge guard adds face area and twist weight (7.0) to a paddle that already had one of the most durable spin surfaces in the sport.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is maneuverability: Ronbus Tenon scores 78 against 70 for Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 — an 8-point gap. They are effectively level on touch, control, forgiveness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Ronbus Tenon is $40 cheaper at $180.
Maneuverability
Ronbus Tenon leads by 8 points (78 vs 70).
Softness
Ronbus Tenon leads by 7 points (85 vs 78).
Spin
Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 leads by 4 points (94 vs 90).
Swing weight
Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 leads by 4 points (76 vs 72).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (88.5 vs 90 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus Tenon and keep the $40.
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.4 vs 86.2 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus Tenon and keep the $40.
- Maneuverability
- Touch
- Control
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.7 vs 86.5 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus Tenon and keep the $40.
- Maneuverability
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Ronbus Tenon
Ronbus Tenon is a narrow pick at this level — softness 85 vs 78. Its 16 mm Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer core at 8 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Ronbus Tenon
Take Ronbus Tenon if you want maneuverability (+8), softness (+7). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Ronbus Tenon review →Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16
Take Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 if you want spin (+4), swing weight (+4), twist weight (+4). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 review →Ronbus Tenon vs Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Ronbus Tenon or the Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16?
- Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88.2 vs 87.8), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — maneuverability — Ronbus Tenon leads by 8 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Ronbus Tenon, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Ronbus Tenon or the Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 for power.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Ronbus Tenon at 91 versus 89. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 scores 94 for spin off its Aramid fiber face, against 90 for the Raw T700 carbon face on Ronbus Tenon. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16, with the higher forgiveness score (90 vs 88). Its 7 twist weight against 6.7 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Ronbus Tenon costs $180, $40 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Ronbus Tenon: 16 mm Foam-perimeter thermoformed polymer core with a Raw T700 carbon face. Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16: 16 mm Thermoformed honeycomb polymer with foam edgewalls core with an Aramid fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Ronbus Tenon rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Ronbus Tenon at 8 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Ronbus Tenon to the Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Ronbus Tenon leads on maneuverability by 8 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $180 vs $220, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Infinity Ruby 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
- Infinity Ruby 16 vs CRBN-1X
- Infinity Ruby 16 vs Pro Ultimate Elongated 16
- Infinity Ruby 16 vs Coral Pro
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Ronbus Tenon and Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Ronbus Tenon and Six Zero Infinity Ruby 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.