LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Quick answer
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin, control and hand speed on Paddle DNA against the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, which costs $179.
Power
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
93 vs 85
Spin
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
95 vs 88
Control
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
88 vs 78
Forgiveness
Too close to call
82 vs 80
Hand speed
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
110 vs 122 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$175 at IQ 85.6 vs $179 at IQ 82.1
Overall pick: Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) · $175 · IQ 85.6
Paddle DNA head-to-head
Estimated scores: the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.
- 93Power85
- 78Control88
- 88Spin95
- 80Forgiveness82
- 81Sweet spot84
- 84Stability83
- 68Maneuverability84
- 92Pop82
- 77Touch86
- 80Consistency88
- 82Swing weight68
- 80Twist weight82
- 61Launch angle57
- 91Plow through78
- 69Softness80
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm | Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $179 | $175 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 82.1 | 85.6 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.93 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 15 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 122 | 110 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.54 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.48 | 7.375 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.52 | 5.375 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.13 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit | Aerospace bi-directional carbon with exposed aramid weave |
| Core material | XPOP modified foam | Nomex and polypropylene hybrid honeycomb |
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm verdict
A head-loaded offensive option with listed swing weight 122 ±3 despite a 7.93 oz average static weight. XPOP is designed for lively rebound; soft resets require touch. Estimated DNA is not proof of a measured power or spin win over Spitfire.
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) verdict
The exposed Kevlar weave is the story: it grips the ball like a fresh grit face but, unlike sprayed textures, it is the material itself, so the spin number does not decay over a season.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is maneuverability: Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) scores 84 against 68 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, forgiveness, twist weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($179 vs $175) that it should not break the tie.
Maneuverability
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads by 16 points (84 vs 68).
Swing weight
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 14 points (82 vs 68).
Plow through
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 13 points (91 vs 78).
Softness
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads by 11 points (80 vs 69).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) is a narrow pick at this level — consistency 88 vs 80, control 88 vs 78, sweet spot 84 vs 81. Twist weight 6.3 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Consistency
- Control
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) is the clearer pick at this level — maneuverability 84 vs 68, control 88 vs 78, spin 95 vs 88. At 110 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Control
- Spin
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 84 vs 68, touch 86 vs 77, spin 95 vs 88. Swing weight 110 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Maneuverability
- Touch
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) is the clearer pick at this level — softness 80 vs 69, forgiveness 82 vs 80, twist weight 82 vs 80. Its 15 mm Nomex and polypropylene hybrid honeycomb core at 7.9 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Take LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm if you want swing weight (+14), plow through (+13), pop (+10). Its swing weight of 122 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm review →Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
Take Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) if you want maneuverability (+16), softness (+11), control (+10). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 15 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) review →Where to Buy
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) FAQ
- Which is better, the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm or the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (85.6 vs 82.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — maneuverability — Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads by 16 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner), at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 122 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm or the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 93 for power against 85 for Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner). That comes from a 16 mm XPOP modified foam core swinging at 122 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) at 88 versus 78. Its 15 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) scores 95 for spin off its Aerospace bi-directional carbon with exposed aramid weave face, against 88 for the Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face on LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. In practice a 7-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner), with the higher forgiveness score (82 vs 80). Twist weight is identical at 6.3, so the gap comes from sweet-spot size and face stability rather than resistance to twisting.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $4 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm: 16 mm XPOP modified foam core with a Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner): 15 mm Nomex and polypropylene hybrid honeycomb core with an Aerospace bi-directional carbon with exposed aramid weave face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, at 5.52 in of handle against 5.375 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 82 and sweet spot 84 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) at 7.9 oz against 7.93 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 122) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm to the Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner)?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) leads on maneuverability by 16 points; everything else is within 14 points. At $179 vs $175, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Spitfire Elongated 16mm
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Series One Project Black
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Perseus Pro V 16
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Double Black Diamond Control
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Loco 16mm Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Black Diamond Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vanguard Power Air
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Labs Project 006
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Series Two Project Flash
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Ruby Hybrid 16
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Vice V2 16
- Series Four (Project Roadrunner) vs Scorpeus Pro IV 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner) in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and Proton Series Four (Project Roadrunner). Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.