LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Quick answer
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin and forgiveness on Paddle DNA against the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14, which costs $180.
Power
Too close to call
93 vs 91
Spin
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
88 vs 83
Control
Too close to call
79 vs 78
Forgiveness
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
80 vs 72
Hand speed
115 vs 122 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$179 at IQ 82.1 vs $180 at IQ 78.6
Overall pick: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm · $179 · IQ 82.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
Estimated scores: the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.
- 93Power91
- 78Control79
- 88Spin83
- 80Forgiveness72
- 81Sweet spot74
- 84Stability80
- 68Maneuverability73
- 92Pop92
- 77Touch72
- 80Consistency78
- 82Swing weight74
- 80Twist weight71
- 61Launch angle54
- 91Plow through88
- 69Softness56
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm | Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $179 — better | $180 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 82.1 — better | 78.6 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.93 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 122 | 115 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.3 — better | 6 |
| Shape | elongated | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16.54 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 7.48 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.52 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.13 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit | Carbon fiber |
| Core material | XPOP modified foam | Bantam power core |
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm verdict
A head-loaded offensive option with listed swing weight 122 ±3 despite a 7.93 oz average static weight. XPOP is designed for lively rebound; soft resets require touch. Estimated DNA is not proof of a measured power or spin win over Spitfire.
Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 verdict
A pure pop paddle. Counters come off the face faster than almost anything in the database, and the trade-off is a firm, chatty feel on soft shots.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 69 against 56 for Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 — a 13-point gap. They are effectively level on plow through, power, consistency, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($179 vs $180) that it should not break the tie.
Softness
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 13 points (69 vs 56).
Twist weight
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 9 points (80 vs 71).
Forgiveness
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 8 points (80 vs 72).
Swing weight
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 8 points (82 vs 74).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 80 vs 72, sweet spot 81 vs 74, twist weight 80 vs 71. Twist weight 6.3 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 80 vs 72, spin 88 vs 83, touch 77 vs 72. At 122 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Forgiveness
- Spin
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is a narrow pick at this level — spin 88 vs 83, touch 77 vs 72, plow through 91 vs 88. Swing weight 122 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Spin
- Touch
- Plow through
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is the clearer pick at this level — softness 69 vs 56, forgiveness 80 vs 72, twist weight 80 vs 71. Its 16 mm XPOP modified foam core at 7.93 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Take LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm if you want softness (+13), twist weight (+9), forgiveness (+8). Its swing weight of 122 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm review →Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14
Take Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 if you want maneuverability (+5). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 review →Where to Buy
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 FAQ
- Which is better, the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm or the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (82.1 vs 78.6), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 13 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14, at 115 kg·cm² swing weight against 122 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm or the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 93 for power against 91 for Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14. That comes from a 16 mm XPOP modified foam core swinging at 122 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 at 79 versus 78. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 88 for spin off its Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face, against 83 for the Carbon fiber face on Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14. In practice a 5-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, with the higher forgiveness score (80 vs 72). Its 6.3 twist weight against 6 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $1 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm: 16 mm XPOP modified foam core with a Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face. Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14: 14 mm Bantam power core with a Carbon fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, at 5.52 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 80 and sweet spot 81 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm at 7.93 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (122 vs 115) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 to the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads on softness by 13 points; everything else is within 9 points. At $179 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Spitfire Elongated 16mm
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Tempest Wave V3
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Bantam ALW-C 14
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Loco 16mm Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Black Diamond Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vanguard Power Air
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Labs Project 006
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs CX14H Ultimate Power
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Power Pro X 14
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs Vanguard Power Air
- Bantam TKO-C 14 vs CRBN-1X Power Series
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and Paddletek Bantam TKO-C 14. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.