JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Vatic Pro Oni 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Vatic Pro Oni 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, which costs $300.
Power
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Spin
Too close to call
92 vs 89
Control
96 vs 86
Forgiveness
Too close to call
86 vs 84
Hand speed
115 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$130 at IQ 84.6 vs $300 at IQ 89.1
Overall pick: Vatic Pro Oni 16 · $130 · IQ 84.6
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 88Power88
- 96Control86
- 92Spin89
- 86Forgiveness84
- 88Sweet spot85
- 90Stability86
- 73Maneuverability74
- 80Pop85
- 94Touch82
- 93Consistency84
- 74Swing weight78
- 88Twist weight83
- 51Launch angle60
- 86Plow through84
- 80Softness82
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Vatic Pro Oni 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 | Vatic Pro Oni 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $300 | $130 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 89.1 — better | 84.6 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 115 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.7 — better | 6.6 |
| Shape | hybrid | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.3 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | Raw T700 carbon |
| Core material | KineticFrame foam-injected polymer | Foam-edged thermoformed polymer |
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 verdict
The 2026 control flagship. The KineticFrame build stiffens the perimeter without adding face pop, so resets land shorter and drives stay predictable — at the highest price in the database.
Vatic Pro Oni 16 verdict
Vatic's answer to the $250 foam paddles at roughly half the price. It gives up some polish in finish quality, not in scored performance.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is touch: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 94 against 82 for Vatic Pro Oni 16 — a 12-point gap. They are effectively level on spin, sweet spot, forgiveness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Vatic Pro Oni 16 is $170 cheaper at $130.
Touch
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 12 points (94 vs 82).
Control
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 10 points (96 vs 86).
Consistency
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 9 points (93 vs 84).
Launch angle
Vatic Pro Oni 16 leads by 9 points (60 vs 51).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is a narrow pick at this level — consistency 93 vs 84, twist weight 88 vs 83, control 96 vs 86. Twist weight 6.7 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Consistency
- Twist weight
- Control
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is a narrow pick at this level — control 96 vs 86, touch 94 vs 82, consistency 93 vs 84. At 118 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Control
- Touch
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is a narrow pick at this level — touch 94 vs 82, control 96 vs 86, spin 92 vs 89. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Touch
- Control
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.1 vs 82.7 on the weighted index). Take Vatic Pro Oni 16 and keep the $170.
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
Take JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 if you want touch (+12), control (+10), consistency (+9). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 review →Vatic Pro Oni 16
Take Vatic Pro Oni 16 if you want launch angle (+9), pop (+5), swing weight (+4). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Vatic Pro Oni 16 review →JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Vatic Pro Oni 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the Vatic Pro Oni 16?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (89.1 vs 84.6), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — touch — JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 12 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Vatic Pro Oni 16, at 115 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the Vatic Pro Oni 16?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 for power.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 at 96 versus 86. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw Toray T700 carbon face, against 89 for the Raw T700 carbon face on Vatic Pro Oni 16. In practice a 3-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, with the higher forgiveness score (86 vs 84). Its 6.7 twist weight against 6.6 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Vatic Pro Oni 16 costs $130, $170 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16: 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. Vatic Pro Oni 16: 16 mm Foam-edged thermoformed polymer core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Vatic Pro Oni 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Vatic Pro Oni 16 at 8.2 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (115 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Vatic Pro Oni 16 to the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads on touch by 12 points; everything else is within 10 points. At $300 vs $130, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus CFS 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Pro Ultimate Elongated 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus Pro IV 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 and Vatic Pro Oni 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 and Vatic Pro Oni 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

