JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A

Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16

JOOLA

Perseus Pro V 16

89$300
Full review →
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A

Six Zero

Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A

81$220
Full review →

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 88Power83
  • 96Control92
  • 92Spin92
  • 86Forgiveness79
  • 88Sweet spot79
  • 90Stability71
  • 73Maneuverability87
  • 80Pop75
  • 94Touch92
  • 93Consistency81
  • 74Swing weight58
  • 88Twist weight56
  • 51Launch angle50
  • 86Plow through69
  • 80Softness84

Specs

Specification comparison
$300Price$220
16 mmCore16 mm
8.3 ozWeight8.15 oz
118Swing weight105
6.7Twist weight5.8
hybridShapehybrid
Raw Toray T700 carbonSurfaceDouble Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber
5.5 inHandle5.5 in

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 verdict

The 2026 control flagship. The KineticFrame build stiffens the perimeter without adding face pop, so resets land shorter and drives stay predictable — at the highest price in the database.

Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A verdict

The UPA-A revision brings the Coral Pro under the new pro-tour surface limits. It is measurably tamer than the original Coral Pro, and it is the version that is tournament-legal going forward.

The verdict

Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is twist weight: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 88 against 56 for Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A — a 32-point gap. They are effectively level on touch, launch angle, spin, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A is $80 cheaper at $220.

  • Twist weight

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 32 points (88 vs 56).

  • Stability

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 19 points (90 vs 71).

  • Plow through

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 17 points (86 vs 69).

  • Swing weight

    JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 16 points (74 vs 58).

Which one should you buy?

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16

Take JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 if you want twist weight (+32), stability (+19), plow through (+17). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 review →

Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A

Take Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A if you want maneuverability (+14), softness (+4). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A review →

JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A FAQ

Which is better, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (89.1 vs 81.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 32 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 measures 88 on power against 83 for Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. That comes from a 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 at 96 versus 92. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw Toray T700 carbon face, against 92 for the Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face on Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. In practice a 0-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, with 6.7 twist weight against 5.8. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (86) as a result.
Is the price difference worth it?
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A costs $220, $80 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16: 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A: 16 mm ProPulsion Foam core with a Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A at 8.15 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A to the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads on twist weight by 32 points; everything else is within 19 points. At $300 vs $220, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 and Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.