JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Quick answer
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin, control, forgiveness and hand speed on Paddle DNA against the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, which costs $179.
Power
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
93 vs 88
Spin
92 vs 88
Control
96 vs 78
Forgiveness
86 vs 80
Hand speed
118 vs 122 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
$179 at IQ 82.1 vs $300 at IQ 89.1
Overall pick: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 · $300 · IQ 89.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
Estimated scores: the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.
- 88Power93
- 96Control78
- 92Spin88
- 86Forgiveness80
- 88Sweet spot81
- 90Stability84
- 73Maneuverability68
- 80Pop92
- 94Touch77
- 93Consistency80
- 74Swing weight82
- 88Twist weight80
- 51Launch angle61
- 86Plow through91
- 80Softness69
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 | LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $300 | $179 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 89.1 — better | 82.1 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 7.93 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 122 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.7 — better | 6.3 |
| Shape | hybrid | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.54 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.48 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.52 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.13 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit |
| Core material | KineticFrame foam-injected polymer | XPOP modified foam |
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 verdict
The 2026 control flagship. The KineticFrame build stiffens the perimeter without adding face pop, so resets land shorter and drives stay predictable — at the highest price in the database.
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm verdict
A head-loaded offensive option with listed swing weight 122 ±3 despite a 7.93 oz average static weight. XPOP is designed for lively rebound; soft resets require touch. Estimated DNA is not proof of a measured power or spin win over Spitfire.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is control: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 96 against 78 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm — an 18-point gap. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm is $121 cheaper at $179.
Control
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 18 points (96 vs 78).
Touch
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 17 points (94 vs 77).
Consistency
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 13 points (93 vs 80).
Pop
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 12 points (92 vs 80).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the clearer pick at this level — consistency 93 vs 80, sweet spot 88 vs 81, forgiveness 86 vs 80. Twist weight 6.7 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Consistency
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the clearer pick at this level — control 96 vs 78, touch 94 vs 77, consistency 93 vs 80. At 118 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Control
- Touch
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is a narrow pick at this level — touch 94 vs 77, control 96 vs 78, spin 92 vs 88. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Touch
- Control
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 80 vs 69, forgiveness 86 vs 80, twist weight 88 vs 80. Its 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core at 8.3 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
Take JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 if you want control (+18), touch (+17), consistency (+13). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 review →LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Take LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm if you want pop (+12), launch angle (+10), swing weight (+8). Its swing weight of 122 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm review →Where to Buy
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (89.1 vs 82.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — control — JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads by 18 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, at 118 kg·cm² swing weight against 122 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 or the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 93 for power against 88 for JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16. That comes from a 16 mm XPOP modified foam core swinging at 122 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 at 96 versus 78. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 scores 92 for spin off its Raw Toray T700 carbon face, against 88 for the Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face on LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16, with the higher forgiveness score (86 vs 80). Its 6.7 twist weight against 6.3 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm costs $179, $121 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16: 16 mm KineticFrame foam-injected polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm: 16 mm XPOP modified foam core with a Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, at 5.52 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm at 7.93 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (122 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm to the JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 leads on control by 18 points; everything else is within 17 points. At $300 vs $179, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus Pro IV 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Hyperion Pro V 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs 2X Power Series
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Series Four (Project Roadrunner)
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus Pro V 14
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Coral Pro
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Prism Flash
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus CFS 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Pro Ultimate Elongated 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs Perseus Pro IV 16
- Perseus Pro V 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Labs Project 006
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus Pro V 16 and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.