JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, which costs $240.
Power
Too close to call
84 vs 83
Spin
Too close to call
92 vs 91
Control
Too close to call
95 vs 92
Forgiveness
Too close to call
82 vs 79
Hand speed
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
105 vs 116 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
$220 at IQ 81.2 vs $240 at IQ 87.1
Overall pick: Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A · $220 · IQ 81.2
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 84Power83
- 95Control92
- 91Spin92
- 82Forgiveness79
- 84Sweet spot79
- 88Stability71
- 74Maneuverability87
- 79Pop75
- 93Touch92
- 92Consistency81
- 72Swing weight58
- 86Twist weight56
- 52Launch angle50
- 83Plow through69
- 78Softness84
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 vs Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 | Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $240 | $220 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87.1 — better | 81.2 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.2 | 8.15 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 116 | 105 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.4 — better | 5.8 |
| Shape | hybrid | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.3 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.125 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber |
| Core material | Propulsion polymer | ProPulsion Foam |
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 verdict
The most complete tournament paddle in the database. Control numbers sit at the top of the field without giving up the drive speed you need to finish points.
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A verdict
The UPA-A revision brings the Coral Pro under the new pro-tour surface limits. It is measurably tamer than the original Coral Pro, and it is the version that is tournament-legal going forward.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is twist weight: JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 scores 86 against 56 for Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A — a 30-point gap. They are effectively level on control, forgiveness, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A is $20 cheaper at $220.
Twist weight
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 30 points (86 vs 56).
Stability
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 17 points (88 vs 71).
Swing weight
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 14 points (72 vs 58).
Plow through
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 14 points (83 vs 69).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 is the clearer pick at this level — twist weight 86 vs 56, stability 88 vs 71, consistency 92 vs 81. Twist weight 6.4 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Twist weight
- Stability
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.3 vs 87 on the weighted index). Take Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A and keep the $20.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.7 vs 86.9 on the weighted index). Take Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A and keep the $20.
- Plow through
- Control
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 86 vs 56, forgiveness 82 vs 79. Its 16 mm Propulsion polymer core at 8.2 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A
Take Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A if you want maneuverability (+13), softness (+6). Its swing weight of 105 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A review →JOOLA Perseus CFS 16
Take JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 if you want twist weight (+30), stability (+17), swing weight (+14). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 review →Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 81.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — twist weight — JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads by 30 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A, at 105 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A or the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 scores 84 for power against 83 for Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. That comes from a 16 mm Propulsion polymer core swinging at 116 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 at 95 versus 92. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A scores 92 for spin off its Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face, against 91 for the Raw Toray T700 carbon face on JOOLA Perseus CFS 16. In practice a 1-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16, with the higher forgiveness score (82 vs 79). Its 6.4 twist weight against 5.8 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A costs $220, $20 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A: 16 mm ProPulsion Foam core with a Double Diamond Tough Raw Carbon Fiber face. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 82 and sweet spot 84 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A at 8.15 oz against 8.2 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (105 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A to the JOOLA Perseus CFS 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 leads on twist weight by 30 points; everything else is within 17 points. At $220 vs $240, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
This matchup is a stability vs maneuverability decision
Browse every head-to-head that splits on the same trade-off:
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus CFS 16 vs Perseus Pro V 16
- Perseus CFS 16 vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
- Perseus CFS 16 vs Scorpeus Pro IV 16
- Perseus CFS 16 vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Coral Hybrid 16
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs BALLR+ 16
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A vs Hyperion C2 CFS 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus CFS 16 and Six Zero Coral Pro Hybrid UPA-A. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.