JOOLA Essentials 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Essentials 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
JOOLA Essentials 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes control, forgiveness and value on Paddle DNA against the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, which costs $105.
Power
Too close to call
76 vs 74
Spin
90 vs 78
Control
89 vs 85
Forgiveness
91 vs 77
Hand speed
93 vs 108 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$89 at IQ 82.2 vs $105 at IQ 79.4
Overall pick: JOOLA Essentials 16 · $89 · IQ 82.2
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 74Power76
- 89Control85
- 78Spin90
- 91Forgiveness77
- 92Sweet spot76
- 79Stability74
- 84Maneuverability98
- 76Pop79
- 82Touch85
- 86Consistency79
- 46Swing weight39
- 71Twist weight68
- 66Launch angle51
- 62Plow through47
- 88Softness82
JOOLA Essentials 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Essentials 16 | Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $89 — better | $105 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 82.2 — better | 79.4 |
| Weight(oz) | 7.9 | 7.65 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 12.7 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 108 | 93 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 5.8 | 6.2 — better |
| Shape | standard | standard |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 15.9375 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 8 |
| Handle length(in) | 5 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Textured fiberglass | PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber |
| Core material | Polypropylene honeycomb | Polymer Honeycomb |
JOOLA Essentials 16 verdict
The widest sweet-spot score in our sub-$100 group. Mishits off the top third still clear the net, which is exactly what a new player needs while their contact point is inconsistent.
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 verdict
At 7.65 oz this is the lightest paddle in the database, and the 12.7 mm core makes it faster still. It is a hands-speed specialist, not a power tool.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is sweet spot: JOOLA Essentials 16 scores 92 against 76 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on pop, touch, twist weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Essentials 16 is $16 cheaper at $89.
Sweet spot
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 16 points (92 vs 76).
Launch angle
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 15 points (66 vs 51).
Plow through
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 15 points (62 vs 47).
Forgiveness
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 14 points (91 vs 77).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
JOOLA Essentials 16
JOOLA Essentials 16 is the clearer pick at this level — sweet spot 92 vs 76, forgiveness 91 vs 77, consistency 86 vs 79. Twist weight 5.8 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Consistency
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 98 vs 84, spin 90 vs 78, touch 85 vs 82. At 93 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
- Touch
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 is a narrow pick at this level — spin 90 vs 78, maneuverability 98 vs 84, touch 85 vs 82. Swing weight 93 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Spin
- Maneuverability
- Touch
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
JOOLA Essentials 16
JOOLA Essentials 16 is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 91 vs 77, softness 88 vs 82, twist weight 71 vs 68. Its 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core at 7.9 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Forgiveness
- Softness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Essentials 16
Take JOOLA Essentials 16 if you want sweet spot (+16), launch angle (+15), plow through (+15). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Essentials 16 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 if you want maneuverability (+14), spin (+12). Its swing weight of 93 kg·cm² and 12.7 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 review →JOOLA Essentials 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Essentials 16 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (82.2 vs 79.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — sweet spot — JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 16 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 93 kg·cm² swing weight against 108 for JOOLA Essentials 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Essentials 16 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 scores 76 for power against 74 for JOOLA Essentials 16. That comes from a 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core swinging at 93 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 at 89 versus 85. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 scores 90 for spin off its PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face, against 78 for the Textured fiberglass face on JOOLA Essentials 16. In practice a 12-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Essentials 16, with the higher forgiveness score (91 vs 77). Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 actually carries the higher twist weight (6.2 vs 5.8), but JOOLA Essentials 16 makes it back on sweet spot (92) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 costs $89, $16 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Essentials 16: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core with a Textured fiberglass face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7: 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core with a PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 91 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 at 7.65 oz against 7.9 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (93 vs 108) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 to the JOOLA Essentials 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Essentials 16 leads on sweet spot by 16 points; everything else is within 15 points. At $89 vs $105, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Essentials 16 vs Encore Pro EX
- Essentials 16 vs Prism Flash
- Essentials 16 vs Signature Carbon STR
- Essentials 16 vs Kinetic Pro Flight
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Scorpeus 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Essentials 16 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Essentials 16 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.