JOOLA Essentials 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. JOOLA Essentials 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 74Power76
- 89Control85
- 78Spin90
- 91Forgiveness77
- 92Sweet spot76
- 79Stability74
- 84Maneuverability98
- 76Pop79
- 82Touch85
- 86Consistency79
- 46Swing weight39
- 71Twist weight68
- 66Launch angle51
- 62Plow through47
- 88Softness82
Specs
| $89 | Price | $105 |
|---|---|---|
| 16 mm | Core | 12.7 mm |
| 7.9 oz | Weight | 7.65 oz |
| 108 | Swing weight | 93 |
| 5.8 | Twist weight | 6.2 |
| standard | Shape | standard |
| Textured fiberglass | Surface | PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber |
| 5 in | Handle | 5.25 in |
JOOLA Essentials 16 verdict
The widest measured sweet spot in our sub-$100 test group. Mishits off the top third still clear the net, which is exactly what a new player needs while their contact point is inconsistent.
Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 verdict
At 7.65 oz this is the lightest paddle in the database, and the 12.7 mm core makes it faster still. It is a hands-speed specialist, not a power tool.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is sweet spot: JOOLA Essentials 16 scores 92 against 76 for Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on pop, touch, twist weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Essentials 16 is $16 cheaper at $89.
Sweet spot
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 16 points (92 vs 76).
Launch angle
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 15 points (66 vs 51).
Plow through
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 15 points (62 vs 47).
Forgiveness
JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 14 points (91 vs 77).
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Essentials 16
Take JOOLA Essentials 16 if you want sweet spot (+16), launch angle (+15), plow through (+15). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Essentials 16 review →Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7
Take Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 if you want maneuverability (+14), spin (+12). Its swing weight of 93 kg·cm² and 12.7 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 review →JOOLA Essentials 16 vs Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Essentials 16 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (82.2 vs 79.4), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — sweet spot — JOOLA Essentials 16 leads by 16 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 93 kg·cm² swing weight against 108 for JOOLA Essentials 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Essentials 16 or the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 measures 76 on power against 74 for JOOLA Essentials 16. That comes from a 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core swinging at 93 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 at 89 versus 85. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 scores 90 for spin off its PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face, against 78 for the Textured fiberglass face on JOOLA Essentials 16. In practice a 12-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, with 6.2 twist weight against 5.8. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and JOOLA Essentials 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (91) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 costs $89, $16 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Essentials 16: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb core with a Textured fiberglass face. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7: 12.7 mm Polymer Honeycomb core with a PT-700 Raw Carbon Fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Essentials 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 91 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 at 7.65 oz against 7.9 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (93 vs 108) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7 to the JOOLA Essentials 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Essentials 16 leads on sweet spot by 16 points; everything else is within 15 points. At $89 vs $105, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Essentials 16 vs Encore Pro EX
- Essentials 16 vs Prism Flash
- Essentials 16 vs Signature Carbon STR
- Essentials 16 vs Kinetic Pro Flight
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Scorpeus 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Labs Project 007 Epic 14
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs Pursuit Pro1 6.0 Hybrid
- Bantam ALW-C 12.7 vs CRBN⁴ TruFoam Barrage
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Essentials 16 and Paddletek Bantam ALW-C 12.7. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.