Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 85.2), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
95 vs 78
Spin
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
91 vs 86
Control
91 vs 84
Forgiveness
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Hand speed
Too close to call
118 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$220 at IQ 85.2 vs $332.99 at IQ 87.1
Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 · $332.99 · IQ 87.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 78Power95
- 91Control84
- 86Spin91
- 88Forgiveness88
- 88Sweet spot89
- 86Stability92
- 72Maneuverability66
- 71Pop90
- 90Touch80
- 89Consistency85
- 74Swing weight82
- 85Twist weight92
- 53Launch angle58
- 79Plow through93
- 89Softness72
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 | Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $220 — better | $332.99 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 85.2 | 87.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.25 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 118 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 | 7.2 — better |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.45 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Specialized carbon | Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit |
| Core material | Control Pro core | BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring |
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 verdict
Engage's dwell-time engineering is real: the ball sits on the face long enough to shape shots that other elongated paddles simply cannot.
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict
The highest power score in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is pop: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 90 against 71 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 — a 19-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, forgiveness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 is $112.99000000000001 cheaper at $220.
Pop
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 19 points (90 vs 71).
Power
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 17 points (95 vs 78).
Softness
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 leads by 17 points (89 vs 72).
Plow through
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 14 points (93 vs 79).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (87.6 vs 88.7 on the weighted index). Take Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and keep the $112.99000000000001.
- Twist weight
- Stability
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.4 vs 83.6 on the weighted index). Take Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and keep the $112.99000000000001.
- Touch
- Control
- Maneuverability
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — power 95 vs 78, plow through 93 vs 79, spin 91 vs 86. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Power
- Plow through
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 89 vs 72. Its 16 mm Control Pro core at 8.3 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0
Take Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 if you want softness (+17), touch (+10), control (+7). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 review →Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want pop (+19), power (+17), plow through (+14). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 85.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 19 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both swing at 118 kg·cm², and swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 78 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 at 91 versus 84. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 91 for spin off its Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face, against 86 for the Specialized carbon face on Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. In practice a 5-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 6.5 and 7.2.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 costs $220, $112.99000000000001 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0: 16 mm Control Pro core with a Specialized carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 8.25 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight is identical at 118 kg·cm², so they will feel the same mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads on pop by 19 points; everything else is within 17 points. At $220 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Encore Pro EX
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Pursuit Ultra MX 6.0
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Labs Project Boomstik Widebody 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Perseus Pro V 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Coral Pro
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Perseus CFS 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs CRBN-3X Power Series
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Model E Max V3
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Radius CGS 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Ultré Power 2
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Hyperion Pro V 16
- Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 vs Labs 008 Project 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

