Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 vs JOOLA Radius CGS 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Radius CGS 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed on Paddle DNA against the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0, which costs $220.
Power
Too close to call
79 vs 78
Spin
Too close to call
88 vs 86
Control
Too close to call
91 vs 91
Forgiveness
Too close to call
90 vs 88
Hand speed
108 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$220 at IQ 85.2 vs $230 at IQ 86.1
Overall pick: JOOLA Radius CGS 16 · $230 · IQ 86.1
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 78Power79
- 91Control91
- 86Spin88
- 88Forgiveness90
- 88Sweet spot92
- 86Stability86
- 72Maneuverability78
- 71Pop74
- 90Touch89
- 89Consistency88
- 74Swing weight68
- 85Twist weight82
- 53Launch angle50
- 79Plow through78
- 89Softness82
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 vs JOOLA Radius CGS 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 | JOOLA Radius CGS 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $220 — better | $230 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 85.2 | 86.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 108 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 | 6.8 — better |
| Shape | elongated | widebody |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 15.9 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Specialized carbon | Charged Surface Technology carbon |
| Core material | Control Pro core | Reactive Polymer Core |
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 verdict
Engage's dwell-time engineering is real: the ball sits on the face long enough to shape shots that other elongated paddles simply cannot.
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 verdict
JOOLA's widebody answer to the elongated arms race. The extra face width buys one of the largest sweet-spot scores in the lineup, and the twist weight is high enough that mishits still come back deep.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 scores 89 against 82 for JOOLA Radius CGS 16 — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on pop, twist weight, launch angle, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($230 vs $220) that it should not break the tie.
Softness
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 leads by 7 points (89 vs 82).
Maneuverability
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 leads by 6 points (78 vs 72).
Swing weight
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 leads by 6 points (74 vs 68).
Sweet spot
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 leads by 4 points (92 vs 88).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (88.4 vs 87.6 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — widebody on the Radius CGS 16, elongated on the Pursuit MX 6.0.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 84.4 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — widebody on the Radius CGS 16, elongated on the Pursuit MX 6.0.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
- Forgiveness
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.8 vs 82.7 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — widebody on the Radius CGS 16, elongated on the Pursuit MX 6.0.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0
Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 89 vs 82, twist weight 85 vs 82. Its 16 mm Control Pro core at 8.3 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Radius CGS 16
Take JOOLA Radius CGS 16 if you want maneuverability (+6), sweet spot (+4). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 review →Engage Pursuit MX 6.0
Take Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 if you want softness (+7), swing weight (+6). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 review →JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 or the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.1 vs 85.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 leads by 7 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, at 108 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 or the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 scores 79 for power against 78 for Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. That comes from a 16 mm Reactive Polymer Core swinging at 108 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 91 for control.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 scores 88 for spin off its Charged Surface Technology carbon face, against 86 for the Specialized carbon face on Engage Pursuit MX 6.0. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, with the higher forgiveness score (90 vs 88). Its 6.8 twist weight against 6.5 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16: 16 mm Reactive Polymer Core with a Charged Surface Technology carbon face. Engage Pursuit MX 6.0: 16 mm Control Pro core with a Specialized carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Engage Pursuit MX 6.0, at 5.5 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 at 8.1 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 to the JOOLA Radius CGS 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 leads on softness by 7 points; everything else is within 6 points. At $230 vs $220, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Pursuit MX 6.0 vs Model E Max V3
- Radius CGS 16 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Radius CGS 16 vs Vision CGS 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs Atlas 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and JOOLA Radius CGS 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Engage Pursuit MX 6.0 and JOOLA Radius CGS 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.