JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs JOOLA Vision CGS 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. JOOLA Radius CGS 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
JOOLA Vision CGS 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes value on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Radius CGS 16, which costs $230.
Power
Too close to call
79 vs 78
Spin
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Control
Too close to call
91 vs 90
Forgiveness
Too close to call
90 vs 88
Hand speed
Too close to call
107 vs 108 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$180 at IQ 85.3 vs $230 at IQ 86.1
Overall pick: JOOLA Vision CGS 16 · $180 · IQ 85.3
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 79Power78
- 91Control90
- 88Spin88
- 90Forgiveness88
- 92Sweet spot88
- 86Stability84
- 78Maneuverability82
- 74Pop74
- 89Touch88
- 88Consistency90
- 68Swing weight66
- 82Twist weight80
- 50Launch angle48
- 78Plow through76
- 82Softness84
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs JOOLA Vision CGS 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Radius CGS 16 | JOOLA Vision CGS 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $230 | $180 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 86.1 — better | 85.3 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 108 | 107 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.8 — better | 6.6 |
| Shape | widebody | standard |
| Face length(in) | 15.9 | 16 |
| Face width(in) | 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Handle length(in) | 5 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Charged Surface Technology carbon | Carbon grit surface |
| Core material | Reactive Polymer Core | Propulsion polymer |
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 verdict
JOOLA's widebody answer to the elongated arms race. The extra face width buys one of the largest sweet-spot scores in the lineup, and the twist weight is high enough that mishits still come back deep.
JOOLA Vision CGS 16 verdict
The friendliest paddle JOOLA sells. Standard shape, 107 swing weight and forgiveness 88 make it the natural first premium paddle for a 3.0 player.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is sweet spot: JOOLA Radius CGS 16 scores 92 against 88 for JOOLA Vision CGS 16 — a 4-point gap. They are effectively level on forgiveness, stability, consistency, so those traits should not decide the purchase. JOOLA Vision CGS 16 is $50 cheaper at $180.
Sweet spot
JOOLA Radius CGS 16 leads by 4 points (92 vs 88).
Maneuverability
JOOLA Vision CGS 16 leads by 4 points (82 vs 78).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (88.4 vs 86.6 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Vision CGS 16 and keep the $50.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
- Stability
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 86.2 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Vision CGS 16 and keep the $50.
- Maneuverability
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.8 vs 83.4 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Vision CGS 16 and keep the $50.
- Plow through
- Power
- Touch
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.2 vs 84.4 on the weighted index). Take JOOLA Vision CGS 16 and keep the $50.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
JOOLA Radius CGS 16
Take JOOLA Radius CGS 16 if you want sweet spot (+4). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 review →JOOLA Vision CGS 16
Take JOOLA Vision CGS 16 if you want maneuverability (+4). Its swing weight of 107 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the JOOLA Vision CGS 16 review →JOOLA Radius CGS 16 vs JOOLA Vision CGS 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 or the JOOLA Vision CGS 16?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (86.1 vs 85.3), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — sweet spot — JOOLA Radius CGS 16 leads by 4 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- JOOLA Vision CGS 16, at 107 kg·cm² swing weight against 108 for JOOLA Radius CGS 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the JOOLA Radius CGS 16 or the JOOLA Vision CGS 16?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 scores 79 for power against 78 for JOOLA Vision CGS 16. That comes from a 16 mm Reactive Polymer Core swinging at 108 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 at 91 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16, with the higher forgiveness score (90 vs 88). Its 6.8 twist weight against 6.6 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- JOOLA Vision CGS 16 costs $180, $50 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16: 16 mm Reactive Polymer Core with a Charged Surface Technology carbon face. JOOLA Vision CGS 16: 16 mm Propulsion polymer core with a Carbon grit surface.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- JOOLA Vision CGS 16, at 5.25 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- JOOLA Radius CGS 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 92 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. JOOLA Vision CGS 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- JOOLA Vision CGS 16 at 7.9 oz against 8.1 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (107 vs 108) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the JOOLA Vision CGS 16 to the JOOLA Radius CGS 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. JOOLA Radius CGS 16 leads on sweet spot by 4 points; everything else is within 4 points. At $230 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Radius CGS 16 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Radius CGS 16 vs Atlas 16
- Radius CGS 16 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
- Vision CGS 16 vs Quartz Hybrid 16
- Vision CGS 16 vs Atlas 16
- Vision CGS 16 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Vision CGS 16 vs Sapphire 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Radius CGS 16 and JOOLA Vision CGS 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Radius CGS 16 and JOOLA Vision CGS 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.