Electrum Model E Max V3 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Electrum Model E Max V3

Electrum

Model E Max V3

85$200
Full review →
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk

Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

87$332.99
Full review →

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 82Power95
  • 88Control84
  • 86Spin91
  • 86Forgiveness88
  • 88Sweet spot89
  • 86Stability92
  • 72Maneuverability66
  • 74Pop90
  • 86Touch80
  • 88Consistency85
  • 78Swing weight82
  • 84Twist weight92
  • 50Launch angle58
  • 82Plow through93
  • 78Softness72

Electrum Model E Max V3 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs

Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the Electrum Model E Max V3 and the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16.
SpecElectrum Model E Max V3Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Street price(USD)$200 — better$332.99
IQ score(/ 100)84.787.1 — better
Weight(oz)8.38.25
Core thickness(mm)1616
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster118118
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable6.97.2 — better
Shapeelongatedelongated
Face length(in)16.516.5
Face width(in)7.57.45
Handle length(in)5.55.8
Grip circumference(in)4.254.25
SurfaceRaw Toray T700 carbonMultistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit
Core materialPolypropylene honeycomb with foam perimeterBoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring

Electrum Model E Max V3 verdict

The Max is the widest-body Electrum yet, and the numbers show it: sweet spot 88 and twist weight 84 are both top-quartile. It is a forgiving elongated paddle, which is not a common combination.

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict

The highest measured power in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.

The verdict

Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is pop: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 90 against 74 for Electrum Model E Max V3 — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on consistency, forgiveness, sweet spot, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Electrum Model E Max V3 is $132.99 cheaper at $200.

  • Pop

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 16 points (90 vs 74).

  • Power

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 13 points (95 vs 82).

  • Plow through

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 11 points (93 vs 82).

  • Twist weight

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 8 points (92 vs 84).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Narrow

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 92 vs 84, stability 92 vs 86, forgiveness 88 vs 86. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Twist weight
  • Stability
  • Forgiveness
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.6 vs 83.6 on the weighted index). Take Electrum Model E Max V3 and keep the $132.99.

  • Power
  • Spin
  • Forgiveness

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Narrow

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — power 95 vs 82, plow through 93 vs 82, spin 91 vs 86. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.

  • Power
  • Plow through
  • Spin
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (81.3 vs 80 on the weighted index). Take Electrum Model E Max V3 and keep the $132.99.

  • Softness

Which one should you buy?

Electrum Model E Max V3

Take Electrum Model E Max V3 if you want maneuverability (+6), touch (+6), softness (+6). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Electrum Model E Max V3 review →

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want pop (+16), power (+13), plow through (+11). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →

Electrum Model E Max V3 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ

Which is better, the Electrum Model E Max V3 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 84.7), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 16 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Electrum Model E Max V3, at 118 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the Electrum Model E Max V3 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 measures 95 on power against 82 for Electrum Model E Max V3. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
Electrum Model E Max V3 at 88 versus 84. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 91 for spin off its Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face, against 86 for the Raw Toray T700 carbon face on Electrum Model E Max V3. In practice a 5-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, with 7.2 twist weight against 6.9. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (88) as a result.
Is the price difference worth it?
Electrum Model E Max V3 costs $200, $132.99 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
Electrum Model E Max V3: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb with foam perimeter core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 8.25 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (118 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Electrum Model E Max V3 to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads on pop by 16 points; everything else is within 13 points. At $200 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Read the full reviews: Electrum Model E Max V3 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.