Electrum Model E Max V3 vs Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Electrum Model E Max V3 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 82Power82
- 88Control90
- 86Spin82
- 86Forgiveness84
- 88Sweet spot84
- 86Stability88
- 72Maneuverability70
- 74Pop76
- 86Touch90
- 88Consistency90
- 78Swing weight78
- 84Twist weight84
- 50Launch angle48
- 82Plow through86
- 78Softness84
Electrum Model E Max V3 vs Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta specs
Every measured spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Electrum Model E Max V3 | Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 | $180 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 84.7 | 84.7 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 19.8 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 120 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.9 — better | 6.5 |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.375 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | FiberFlex fiberglass |
| Core material | Polypropylene honeycomb with foam perimeter | X5 polypropylene honeycomb |
Electrum Model E Max V3 verdict
The Max is the widest-body Electrum yet, and the numbers show it: sweet spot 88 and twist weight 84 are both top-quartile. It is a forgiving elongated paddle, which is not a common combination.
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta verdict
Selkirk's long-running Invikta shape in the softer Vanguard 2.0 build. Touch 90 and consistency 90 with 86 plow-through make it a drive-and-reset paddle for patient players.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is softness: Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta scores 84 against 78 for Electrum Model E Max V3 — a 6-point gap. They are effectively level on control, forgiveness, stability, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta is $20 cheaper at $180.
Softness
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 6 points (84 vs 78).
Spin
Electrum Model E Max V3 leads by 4 points (86 vs 82).
Sweet spot
Electrum Model E Max V3 leads by 4 points (88 vs 84).
Touch
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 4 points (90 vs 86).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 86.6 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta and keep the $20.
- Sweet spot
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.3 vs 83.6 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta and keep the $20.
- Spin
- Maneuverability
- Forgiveness
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.5 vs 83 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta and keep the $20.
- Plow through
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta is a narrow pick at this level — softness 84 vs 78. Its 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core at 8.4 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
Take Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta if you want softness (+6), touch (+4), plow through (+4). Its swing weight of 120 kg·cm² and 19.8 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta review →Electrum Model E Max V3
Take Electrum Model E Max V3 if you want spin (+4), sweet spot (+4). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Electrum Model E Max V3 review →Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Electrum Model E Max V3 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta or the Electrum Model E Max V3?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.7 vs 84.7), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 6 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Electrum Model E Max V3, at 118 kg·cm² swing weight against 120 for Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta or the Electrum Model E Max V3?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta measures 82 on power against 82 for Electrum Model E Max V3. That comes from a 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core swinging at 120 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta at 90 versus 88. Its 19.8 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Electrum Model E Max V3 scores 86 for spin off its Raw Toray T700 carbon face, against 82 for the FiberFlex fiberglass face on Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Electrum Model E Max V3, with 6.9 twist weight against 6.5. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Electrum Model E Max V3 carries the higher forgiveness score (86) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta costs $180, $20 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta: 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core with a FiberFlex fiberglass face. Electrum Model E Max V3: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb with foam perimeter core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Electrum Model E Max V3, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Electrum Model E Max V3 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Electrum Model E Max V3 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Electrum Model E Max V3 at 8.3 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (118 vs 120) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Electrum Model E Max V3 to the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads on softness by 6 points; everything else is within 4 points. At $180 vs $200, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Model E Max V3 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Model E Max V3 vs Mach 1 Forza 16
- Model E Max V3 vs Crush Control 16
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Nova R1
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Pursuit MX 6.0
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Perseus Pro IV 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: Electrum Model E Max V3 and Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.