Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin, forgiveness and hand speed on Paddle DNA against the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta, which costs $180.
Power
Too close to call
82 vs 80
Spin
88 vs 82
Control
Too close to call
90 vs 90
Forgiveness
88 vs 84
Hand speed
108 vs 120 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$180 at IQ 85.8 vs $180 at IQ 84.7
Overall pick: Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 · $180 · IQ 85.8
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 82Power80
- 90Control90
- 82Spin88
- 84Forgiveness88
- 84Sweet spot88
- 88Stability84
- 70Maneuverability82
- 76Pop76
- 90Touch90
- 90Consistency90
- 78Swing weight66
- 84Twist weight80
- 48Launch angle46
- 86Plow through78
- 84Softness88
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta | Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $180 | $180 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 84.7 | 85.8 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 19.8 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 120 | 108 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 | 6.8 — better |
| Shape | elongated | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.2 |
| Face width(in) | 7.375 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.3 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | FiberFlex fiberglass | Raw Toray carbon |
| Core material | X5 polypropylene honeycomb | Thermoformed polypropylene |
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta verdict
Selkirk's long-running Invikta shape in the softer Vanguard 2.0 build. Touch 90 and consistency 90 with 86 plow-through make it a drive-and-reset paddle for patient players.
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 verdict
Six Zero's softest build. Softness 88 and touch 90 make it the most arm-friendly hybrid under $200 without dropping spin below 88.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is maneuverability: Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 scores 82 against 70 for Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta — a 12-point gap. They are effectively level on power, launch angle, control, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Both sell for $180, so price cannot break the tie.
Maneuverability
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 leads by 12 points (82 vs 70).
Swing weight
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 12 points (78 vs 66).
Plow through
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 8 points (86 vs 78).
Spin
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 leads by 6 points (88 vs 82).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86 vs 86.6 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — elongated on the Vanguard 2.0 Invikta, hybrid on the Quartz Hybrid 16.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 82 vs 70, spin 88 vs 82, forgiveness 88 vs 84. At 108 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
- Forgiveness
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.5 vs 84.5 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — elongated on the Vanguard 2.0 Invikta, hybrid on the Quartz Hybrid 16.
- Maneuverability
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16
Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 is a narrow pick at this level — softness 88 vs 84, forgiveness 88 vs 84. Its 16 mm Thermoformed polypropylene core at 7.9 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
Take Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta if you want swing weight (+12), plow through (+8), stability (+4). Its swing weight of 120 kg·cm² and 19.8 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta review →Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16
Take Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 if you want maneuverability (+12), spin (+6), forgiveness (+4). Its swing weight of 108 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 review →Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta or the Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (85.8 vs 84.7), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — maneuverability — Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 leads by 12 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16, at 108 kg·cm² swing weight against 120 for Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta or the Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta scores 82 for power against 80 for Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16. That comes from a 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core swinging at 120 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 90 for control.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 scores 88 for spin off its Raw Toray carbon face, against 82 for the FiberFlex fiberglass face on Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. In practice a 6-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 84). Its 6.8 twist weight against 6.5 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Both list at $180. Too close to call — neither has an advantage here.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta: 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core with a FiberFlex fiberglass face. Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16: 16 mm Thermoformed polypropylene core with a Raw Toray carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16, at 5.3 in of handle against 5.25 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 at 7.9 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (108 vs 120) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta to the Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 leads on maneuverability by 12 points; everything else is within 12 points. At $180 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Luxx Control Air
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Bantam ALW-C 14
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Model E Max V3
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Evoke Pro Carbon 16
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Crush Control 16
- Quartz Hybrid 16 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Model E Max V3
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
- Quartz Hybrid 16 vs Vision CGS 16
- Quartz Hybrid 16 vs Sapphire 16
- Quartz Hybrid 16 vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Quartz Hybrid 16 vs Ruby Hybrid 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta and Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta and Six Zero Quartz Hybrid 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.