Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta wins this matchup for most players: it takes control, hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16, which costs $280.
Power
90 vs 80
Spin
Too close to call
88 vs 86
Control
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
92 vs 84
Forgiveness
Too close to call
86 vs 84
Hand speed
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
114 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
$250 at IQ 85.6 vs $280 at IQ 85.2
Overall pick: Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta · $250 · IQ 85.6
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 90Power80
- 84Control92
- 86Spin88
- 86Forgiveness84
- 88Sweet spot84
- 90Stability88
- 72Maneuverability74
- 86Pop76
- 78Touch92
- 84Consistency90
- 80Swing weight74
- 88Twist weight82
- 58Launch angle46
- 90Plow through84
- 70Softness86
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 | Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $280 | $250 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 85.2 | 85.6 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 114 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 7 — better | 6.5 |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.4 | 7.375 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw carbon fiber | Florek carbon fiber |
| Core material | Foam-injected polymer | X5 polypropylene honeycomb |
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 verdict
A Labs release built for plow-through. Twist weight 88 and stability 90 are among the highest pairings in the database — it simply does not twist on off-center hits.
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta verdict
The Invikta shape of Selkirk's control flagship. Control 92 and touch 92 with elongated reach — the trade is a 114 swing weight that punishes late hands.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta scores 86 against 70 for Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on spin, forgiveness, stability, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta is $30 cheaper at $250.
Softness
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta leads by 16 points (86 vs 70).
Touch
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta leads by 14 points (92 vs 78).
Launch angle
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 leads by 12 points (58 vs 46).
Power
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 leads by 10 points (90 vs 80).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.9 vs 85.8 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta and keep the $30.
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta is a narrow pick at this level — touch 92 vs 78, control 92 vs 84, consistency 90 vs 84. At 114 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Touch
- Control
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84.2 vs 85.1 on the weighted index). Take Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta and keep the $30.
- Touch
- Control
- Spin
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta is the clearer pick at this level — softness 86 vs 70. Its 16 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core at 8.2 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16
Take Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 if you want launch angle (+12), power (+10), pop (+10). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 review →Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta
Take Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta if you want softness (+16), touch (+14), control (+8). Its swing weight of 114 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta review →Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 vs Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 or the Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta?
- Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (85.6 vs 85.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta leads by 16 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta, at 114 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 or the Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta?
- Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 scores 90 for power against 80 for Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta. That comes from a 16 mm Foam-injected polymer core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta at 92 versus 84. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta scores 88 for spin off its Florek carbon fiber face, against 86 for the Raw carbon fiber face on Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16, with the higher forgiveness score (86 vs 84). Its 7 twist weight against 6.5 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta costs $250, $30 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16: 16 mm Foam-injected polymer core with a Raw carbon fiber face. Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta: 16 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core with a Florek carbon fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta at 8.2 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (114 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 to the Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta leads on softness by 16 points; everything else is within 14 points. At $280 vs $250, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs Labs Project 006
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs Hyperion CFS 16
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs TruFoam Genesis X
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs TruFoam Genesis 3
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs OMNI 16
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs Mach 2 Forza 16
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs Ultré Power 2
- LUXX Control Air Invikta vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- LUXX Control Air Invikta vs Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
- LUXX Control Air Invikta vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
- LUXX Control Air Invikta vs Perseus CFS 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 and Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 and Selkirk LUXX Control Air Invikta. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

