CRBN TruFoam Genesis X vs Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. CRBN TruFoam Genesis X takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin and control on Paddle DNA against the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16, which costs $280.
Power
Too close to call
91 vs 90
Spin
90 vs 86
Control
88 vs 84
Forgiveness
Too close to call
86 vs 86
Hand speed
Too close to call
118 vs 119 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$270 at IQ 87 vs $280 at IQ 85.2
Overall pick: CRBN TruFoam Genesis X · $270 · IQ 87
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 91Power90
- 88Control84
- 90Spin86
- 86Forgiveness86
- 88Sweet spot88
- 90Stability90
- 70Maneuverability72
- 87Pop86
- 85Touch78
- 88Consistency84
- 82Swing weight80
- 87Twist weight88
- 58Launch angle58
- 89Plow through90
- 88Softness70
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X vs Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | CRBN TruFoam Genesis X | Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $270 — better | $280 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 87 — better | 85.2 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 119 | 118 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.7 | 7 — better |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.4 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon | Raw carbon fiber |
| Core material | Full TruFoam core | Foam-injected polymer |
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X verdict
The elongated end of the TruFoam family. Full-foam construction keeps resets soft while the extra length adds the reach the Genesis 1 gives up.
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 verdict
A Labs release built for plow-through. Twist weight 88 and stability 90 are among the highest pairings in the database — it simply does not twist on off-center hits.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: CRBN TruFoam Genesis X scores 88 against 70 for Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 — an 18-point gap. They are effectively level on maneuverability, swing weight, power, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($280 vs $270) that it should not break the tie.
Softness
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X leads by 18 points (88 vs 70).
Touch
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X leads by 7 points (85 vs 78).
Control
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X leads by 4 points (88 vs 84).
Spin
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X leads by 4 points (90 vs 86).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.9 vs 87.7 on the weighted index). Pick on static weight — 8.4 oz on the Labs 008 Project 16, 8.3 oz on the TruFoam Genesis X.
- Consistency
- Control
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X is a narrow pick at this level — touch 85 vs 78, control 88 vs 84, spin 90 vs 86. At 119 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Touch
- Control
- Spin
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X is a narrow pick at this level — touch 85 vs 78, spin 90 vs 86, control 88 vs 84. Swing weight 119 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.
- Touch
- Spin
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X
CRBN TruFoam Genesis X is the clearer pick at this level — softness 88 vs 70. Its 16 mm Full TruFoam core at 8.3 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16
Take Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 if you prefer a 16 mm Foam-injected polymer core — it gives up nothing measurable to CRBN TruFoam Genesis X.
Read the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 review →CRBN TruFoam Genesis X
Take CRBN TruFoam Genesis X if you want softness (+18), touch (+7), control (+4). Its swing weight of 119 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the CRBN TruFoam Genesis X review →Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 vs CRBN TruFoam Genesis X FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 or the CRBN TruFoam Genesis X?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis X carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87 vs 85.2), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — CRBN TruFoam Genesis X leads by 18 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16, at 118 kg·cm² swing weight against 119 for CRBN TruFoam Genesis X. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 or the CRBN TruFoam Genesis X?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis X scores 91 for power against 90 for Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16. That comes from a 16 mm Full TruFoam core swinging at 119 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis X at 88 versus 84. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis X scores 90 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 86 for the Raw carbon fiber face on Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16. In practice a 4-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 86 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 7 and 6.7.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16: 16 mm Foam-injected polymer core with a Raw carbon fiber face. CRBN TruFoam Genesis X: 16 mm Full TruFoam core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Forgiveness (86) and sweet spot (88) are identical, so a developing player can start on either — decide on price and handle feel.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis X at 8.3 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (119 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 to the CRBN TruFoam Genesis X?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. CRBN TruFoam Genesis X leads on softness by 18 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $280 vs $270, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- TruFoam Genesis X vs TruFoam Genesis 3
- TruFoam Genesis X vs CRBN-1X
- TruFoam Genesis X vs Pro Ultimate Elongated 16
- TruFoam Genesis X vs Pegasus Gen 3
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs 1X TruFoam Power
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs CRBN-5 TruFoam Hybrid
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs Mach 2 Forza 16
- Labs 008 Project 16 vs Ultré Power 2
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put CRBN TruFoam Genesis X and Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: CRBN TruFoam Genesis X and Selkirk Labs 008 Project 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.