Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 vs Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (84.7 vs 84.5), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.
Power
82 vs 76
Spin
Too close to call
84 vs 82
Control
Too close to call
92 vs 90
Forgiveness
Too close to call
86 vs 84
Hand speed
107 vs 120 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$180 at IQ 84.7 vs $190 at IQ 84.5
Overall pick: Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta · $180 · IQ 84.7
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 76Power82
- 92Control90
- 84Spin82
- 86Forgiveness84
- 86Sweet spot84
- 84Stability88
- 80Maneuverability70
- 72Pop76
- 92Touch90
- 90Consistency90
- 68Swing weight78
- 78Twist weight84
- 46Launch angle48
- 74Plow through86
- 88Softness84
Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 vs Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 | Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $190 | $180 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 84.5 | 84.7 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 19.8 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 107 | 120 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.4 | 6.5 — better |
| Shape | standard | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.9 | 7.375 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.25 | 5.25 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw carbon fiber | FiberFlex fiberglass |
| Core material | Poly-Core II honeycomb | X5 polypropylene honeycomb |
Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 verdict
Paddletek's control benchmark. Control 92, touch 92 and softness 88 with a 107 swing weight is the classic soft-game recipe, updated with a raw carbon face for spin 84.
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta verdict
Selkirk's long-running Invikta shape in the softer Vanguard 2.0 build. Touch 90 and consistency 90 with 86 plow-through make it a drive-and-reset paddle for patient players.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is plow through: Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta scores 86 against 74 for Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 — a 12-point gap. They are effectively level on control, spin, forgiveness, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($190 vs $180) that it should not break the tie.
Plow through
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 12 points (86 vs 74).
Maneuverability
Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 leads by 10 points (80 vs 70).
Swing weight
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 10 points (78 vs 68).
Power
Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 6 points (82 vs 76).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.5 vs 86 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Tempest Pro C 16, elongated on the Vanguard 2.0 Invikta.
- Twist weight
- Stability
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16
Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 80 vs 70, control 92 vs 90, spin 84 vs 82. At 107 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Control
- Spin
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (82.5 vs 83.5 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Tempest Pro C 16, elongated on the Vanguard 2.0 Invikta.
- Plow through
- Power
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.6 vs 84 on the weighted index). Pick on shape — standard on the Tempest Pro C 16, elongated on the Vanguard 2.0 Invikta.
- Softness
- Forgiveness
Which one should you buy?
Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16
Take Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 if you want maneuverability (+10), softness (+4). Its swing weight of 107 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 review →Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
Take Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta if you want plow through (+12), swing weight (+10), power (+6). Its swing weight of 120 kg·cm² and 19.8 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta review →Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 vs Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta FAQ
- Which is better, the Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 or the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.7 vs 84.5), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — plow through — Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads by 12 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16, at 107 kg·cm² swing weight against 120 for Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 or the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta?
- Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta scores 82 for power against 76 for Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16. That comes from a 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core swinging at 120 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 at 92 versus 90. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 scores 84 for spin off its Raw carbon fiber face, against 82 for the FiberFlex fiberglass face on Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. In practice a 2-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16, with the higher forgiveness score (86 vs 84). Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta actually carries the higher twist weight (6.5 vs 6.4), but Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 makes it back on sweet spot (86) and overall face stability.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $10 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16: 16 mm Poly-Core II honeycomb core with a Raw carbon fiber face. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta: 19.8 mm X5 polypropylene honeycomb core with a FiberFlex fiberglass face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.25 in handle.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 86 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 at 7.9 oz against 8.4 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (107 vs 120) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 to the Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta leads on plow through by 12 points; everything else is within 10 points. At $190 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Tempest Pro C 16 vs Quartz Hybrid 16
- Tempest Pro C 16 vs Black Ace LG
- Tempest Pro C 16 vs Sapphire 16
- Tempest Pro C 16 vs Vision CGS 16
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs LUXX Control Air Invikta
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs Model E Max V3
- Vanguard 2.0 Invikta vs 2X TruFoam Genesis
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 and Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Paddletek Tempest Pro C 16 and Selkirk Vanguard 2.0 Invikta. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.