LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Ronbus R4 Pulsar
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Ronbus R4 Pulsar takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Quick answer
Ronbus R4 Pulsar wins this matchup for most players: it takes control, hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, which costs $179.
Power
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
93 vs 88
Spin
Too close to call
88 vs 88
Control
82 vs 78
Forgiveness
Too close to call
82 vs 80
Hand speed
113 vs 122 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$160 at IQ 83.5 vs $179 at IQ 82.1
Overall pick: Ronbus R4 Pulsar · $160 · IQ 83.5
Paddle DNA head-to-head
Estimated scores: the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.
- 93Power88
- 78Control82
- 88Spin88
- 80Forgiveness82
- 81Sweet spot84
- 84Stability86
- 68Maneuverability78
- 92Pop86
- 77Touch78
- 80Consistency84
- 82Swing weight76
- 80Twist weight80
- 61Launch angle56
- 91Plow through86
- 69Softness68
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Ronbus R4 Pulsar specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm | Ronbus R4 Pulsar |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $179 | $160 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 82.1 | 83.5 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 7.93 | 8.1 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 14 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 122 | 113 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.3 | 6.5 — better |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.54 | 16.5 |
| Face width(in) | 7.48 | 7.4 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.52 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.13 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit | Raw T700 carbon |
| Core material | XPOP modified foam | Thermoformed polypropylene with foam walls |
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm verdict
A head-loaded offensive option with listed swing weight 122 ±3 despite a 7.93 oz average static weight. XPOP is designed for lively rebound; soft resets require touch. Estimated DNA is not proof of a measured power or spin win over Spitfire.
Ronbus R4 Pulsar verdict
Ronbus swings for pace with a 14 mm foam-walled build. Power 88 and pop 86 at $160 is the best price-to-punch ratio in the database this year.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is maneuverability: Ronbus R4 Pulsar scores 78 against 68 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm — a 10-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, forgiveness, stability, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Ronbus R4 Pulsar is $19 cheaper at $160.
Maneuverability
Ronbus R4 Pulsar leads by 10 points (78 vs 68).
Pop
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 6 points (92 vs 86).
Swing weight
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 6 points (82 vs 76).
Power
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm leads by 5 points (93 vs 88).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Ronbus R4 Pulsar
Ronbus R4 Pulsar is a narrow pick at this level — sweet spot 84 vs 81, consistency 84 vs 80, forgiveness 82 vs 80. Twist weight 6.5 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Sweet spot
- Consistency
- Forgiveness
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Ronbus R4 Pulsar
Ronbus R4 Pulsar is a narrow pick at this level — maneuverability 78 vs 68, control 82 vs 78, consistency 84 vs 80. At 113 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Maneuverability
- Control
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (84 vs 84 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus R4 Pulsar and keep the $19.
- Maneuverability
- Control
- Touch
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (74 vs 74 on the weighted index). Take Ronbus R4 Pulsar and keep the $19.
- Softness
Which one should you buy?
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Take LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm if you want pop (+6), swing weight (+6), power (+5). Its swing weight of 122 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm review →Ronbus R4 Pulsar
Take Ronbus R4 Pulsar if you want maneuverability (+10), control (+4), consistency (+4). Its swing weight of 113 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Ronbus R4 Pulsar review →Where to Buy
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Ronbus R4 Pulsar
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Ronbus R4 Pulsar FAQ
- Which is better, the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm or the Ronbus R4 Pulsar?
- Ronbus R4 Pulsar carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (83.5 vs 82.1), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — maneuverability — Ronbus R4 Pulsar leads by 10 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Ronbus R4 Pulsar, at 113 kg·cm² swing weight against 122 for LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm or the Ronbus R4 Pulsar?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm scores 93 for power against 88 for Ronbus R4 Pulsar. That comes from a 16 mm XPOP modified foam core swinging at 122 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Ronbus R4 Pulsar at 82 versus 78. Its 14 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 88 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Ronbus R4 Pulsar, with the higher forgiveness score (82 vs 80). Its 6.5 twist weight against 6.3 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Ronbus R4 Pulsar costs $160, $19 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm: 16 mm XPOP modified foam core with a Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit face. Ronbus R4 Pulsar: 14 mm Thermoformed polypropylene with foam walls core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm, at 5.52 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Ronbus R4 Pulsar is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 82 and sweet spot 84 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm at 7.93 oz against 8.1 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (122 vs 113) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm to the Ronbus R4 Pulsar?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. Ronbus R4 Pulsar leads on maneuverability by 10 points; everything else is within 6 points. At $179 vs $160, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Spitfire Elongated 16mm
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Loco 16mm Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Black Diamond Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vanguard Power Air
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Bantam TKO-C 14
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Aura Pro Hybrid 16mm
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Labs Project 006
- R4 Pulsar vs Mach 2 Forza 16
- R4 Pulsar vs V7 Pro 16
- R4 Pulsar vs Black Diamond Power 16
- R4 Pulsar vs Series One Project Black
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and Ronbus R4 Pulsar in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm and Ronbus R4 Pulsar. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.