JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Ronbus R4 Pulsar

Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Ronbus R4 Pulsar takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm

JOOLA

Perseus POWER FX 16mm

82$179.95
Full review →

As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.

Quick answer

Ronbus R4 Pulsar wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin and value on Paddle DNA against the JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm, which costs $179.95.

  • Power

    Too close to call

    91 vs 88

  • Spin

    Ronbus R4 Pulsar

    88 vs 84

  • Control

    Too close to call

    82 vs 80

  • Forgiveness

    Too close to call

    82 vs 82

  • Hand speed

    Too close to call

    Not verified — incompatible or unavailable measurements

  • Value

    Ronbus R4 Pulsar

    $160 at IQ 83.5 vs $179.95 at IQ 81.9

Overall pick: Ronbus R4 Pulsar · $160 · IQ 83.5

Paddle DNA head-to-head

Estimated scores: the JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.

  • 91Power88
  • 80Control82
  • 84Spin88
  • 82Forgiveness82
  • 82Sweet spot84
  • 79Stability86
  • 80Maneuverability78
  • 90Pop86
  • 80Touch78
  • 81Consistency84
  • 70Swing weight76
  • 74Twist weight80
  • 62Launch angle56
  • 82Plow through86
  • 80Softness68

JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Ronbus R4 Pulsar specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm and the Ronbus R4 Pulsar.
SpecJOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mmRonbus R4 Pulsar
Street price(USD)$179.95$160 — better
IQ score(/ 100)81.983.5 — better
Weight(oz)88.1
Core thickness(mm)1614
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings fasterNot verified113
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stableNot verified6.5
Shapeelongatedelongated
Face length(in)16.516.5
Face width(in)7.57.4
Handle length(in)5.55.5
Grip circumference(in)4.1254.25
SurfaceHigher-grit carbon surfaceRaw T700 carbon
Core materialEPP foam with extended propulsion core (full foam)Thermoformed polypropylene with foam walls

JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm verdict

JOOLA’s first full-foam paddle on the familiar 16mm Perseus shape at $179.95, built for effortless power. Comparable swing and twist weights are not published, and every DNA trait is an editorial estimate.

Ronbus R4 Pulsar verdict

Ronbus swings for pace with a 14 mm foam-walled build. Power 88 and pop 86 at $160 is the best price-to-punch ratio in the database this year.

The verdict

Comparable swing and twist measurements are not verified for both paddles. DNA scores are estimates, not laboratory results; compare construction, fit and price rather than a numerical inertia winner.

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Which one should you buy?

JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm

Players who want easy foam power on the Perseus shape

Read the JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm review →

Ronbus R4 Pulsar

Aggressive intermediates on a budget

Read the Ronbus R4 Pulsar review →

Where to Buy

JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm

JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Ronbus R4 Pulsar FAQ

Can these swing and twist weights be compared?
Not yet. One paddle lacks verified compatible catalog inertia. Retailer-scale readings are shown separately and excluded from numerical comparisons.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm and Ronbus R4 Pulsar in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm and Ronbus R4 Pulsar. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.