JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Both Paddle DNA profiles and their derived IQ scores are editorial estimates; they do not establish a measured head-to-head winner.
Luzz Cannon XPP vs JOOLA Power FX Video Comparison
Watch our Luzz Cannon XPP vs JOOLA Power FX comparison to see how these similarly priced full-foam pickleball paddles compare for power, spin, hand speed, stability, control and overall performance.
Quick Verdict
These paddles cost almost exactly the same, but they emphasize different strengths. JOOLA POWER FX has the advantage for easier power and quicker handling, while the Luzz Cannon XPP stands out for higher measured spin and a more planted, stable feel. The better choice depends more on play style than price.
This verdict and its measurements come from the video. Both Paddle DNA profiles on this page are editorial estimates, and prices can change — check the current prices below.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
As an Amazon Associate and affiliate of specialty retailers, we may earn from qualifying purchases — full disclosure.
Paddle DNA head-to-head
Estimated scores: the JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm Paddle DNA is our estimate from published specs, not a sourced profile.
- 91Power93
- 80Control78
- 84Spin88
- 82Forgiveness80
- 82Sweet spot81
- 79Stability84
- 80Maneuverability68
- 90Pop92
- 80Touch77
- 81Consistency80
- 70Swing weight82
- 74Twist weight80
- 62Launch angle61
- 82Plow through91
- 80Softness69
JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm | LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $179.95 | $179 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 81.9 | 82.1 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8 | 7.93 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | Not verified | 122 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | Not verified | 6.3 |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.54 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.48 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.52 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.125 | 4.13 |
| Surface | Higher-grit carbon surface | Carbon fiber with green silicon-carbide grit |
| Core material | EPP foam with extended propulsion core (full foam) | XPOP modified foam |
JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm verdict
JOOLA’s first full-foam paddle on the familiar 16mm Perseus shape at $179.95, built for effortless power. Comparable swing and twist weights are not published, and every DNA trait is an editorial estimate.
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm verdict
A head-loaded offensive option with listed swing weight 122 ±3 despite a 7.93 oz average static weight. XPOP is designed for lively rebound; soft resets require touch. Estimated DNA is not proof of a measured power or spin win over Spitfire.
Where to Buy
JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm
LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm
Luzz Cannon XPP vs JOOLA Power FX FAQ
- Which is better, Luzz Cannon XPP or JOOLA Power FX?
- In the video, JOOLA POWER FX suits players prioritizing easier power and quicker handling, while Cannon XPP is especially compelling for players prioritizing spin and a more planted feel. Our Paddle DNA profiles for both are editorial estimates, not measured head-to-head results.
- Which has more spin, Cannon XPP or POWER FX?
- The video cites independent testing showing a significant spin advantage for the Cannon XPP. We do not have comparable lab spin readings for both paddles on this page.
- Which is faster in the hands?
- The video cites a lower swing weight for POWER FX in comparable testing, which would make it easier to accelerate and reposition. JOOLA does not publish a swing weight, so we cannot confirm that figure ourselves.
- Which is the better value?
- Both list at about $180 (POWER FX $179.95, Cannon XPP $179), so value depends mainly on which performance profile fits your game. Check current prices below.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Spitfire Elongated 16mm
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Loco 2 Hybrid 16mm
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Black Diamond Power 16
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Bantam TKO-C 14
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Warrior Edge 14
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Loco 16mm Elongated
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Evoke Premier Pro
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs CX14E Ultimate Power
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Pressure X 8E Elongated 16mm
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Spitfire Elongated 16mm
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Evoke Premier Pro
- Perseus POWER FX 16mm vs Aura Pro Hybrid 16mm
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs GX2 Power Elongated
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Pro XS 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Vantage Power 16
- Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm vs Labs Project 006
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: JOOLA Perseus POWER FX 16mm and LUZZ Cannon XPP M1 Elongated 16mm. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.

