Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16

Gearbox

Pro Integra Power 16

81$280
Full review →
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk

Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

87$332.99
Full review →

Quick answer

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes spin, control and forgiveness on Paddle DNA against the Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16, which costs $280.

Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 · $332.99 · IQ 87.1

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 94Power95
  • 76Control84
  • 82Spin91
  • 78Forgiveness88
  • 80Sweet spot89
  • 88Stability92
  • 70Maneuverability66
  • 90Pop90
  • 70Touch80
  • 78Consistency85
  • 82Swing weight82
  • 84Twist weight92
  • 62Launch angle58
  • 92Plow through93
  • 56Softness72

Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 and the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16.
SpecGearbox Pro Integra Power 16Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Street price(USD)$280 — better$332.99
IQ score(/ 100)80.987.1 — better
Weight(oz)8.58.25
Core thickness(mm)1616
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster120118
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable6.97.2 — better
Shapeelongatedelongated
Face length(in)16.516.5
Face width(in)7.47.45
Handle length(in)5.55.8
Grip circumference(in)4.254.25
SurfaceSolid-span carbonMultistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit
Core materialSolid carbon coreBoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring

Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 verdict

The most raw power in the database. Power 94 and plow-through 92 come with a 120 swing weight — this is a serve-and-drive weapon, not a kitchen paddle.

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict

The highest power score in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is softness: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 72 against 56 for Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 — a 16-point gap. They are effectively level on power, plow through, pop, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 is $52.99000000000001 cheaper at $280.

  • Softness

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 16 points (72 vs 56).

  • Forgiveness

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 10 points (88 vs 78).

  • Touch

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 10 points (80 vs 70).

  • Spin

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 9 points (91 vs 82).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — forgiveness 88 vs 78, sweet spot 89 vs 80, twist weight 92 vs 84. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Forgiveness
  • Sweet spot
  • Twist weight
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — spin 91 vs 82, control 84 vs 76, forgiveness 88 vs 78. At 118 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.

  • Spin
  • Control
  • Forgiveness
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Narrow

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — spin 91 vs 82, touch 80 vs 70, control 84 vs 76. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.

  • Spin
  • Touch
  • Control
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — softness 72 vs 56, forgiveness 88 vs 78, twist weight 92 vs 84. Its 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core at 8.25 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.

  • Softness
  • Forgiveness
  • Twist weight
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Which one should you buy?

Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16

Take Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 if you want maneuverability (+4), launch angle (+4). Its swing weight of 120 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 review →

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want softness (+16), forgiveness (+10), touch (+10). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →

Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ

Which is better, the Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 80.9), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — softness — Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 16 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 118 kg·cm² swing weight against 120 for Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 94 for Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 84 versus 76. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 91 for spin off its Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face, against 82 for the Solid-span carbon face on Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16. In practice a 9-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 78). Its 7.2 twist weight against 6.9 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
Is the price difference worth it?
Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 costs $280, $52.99000000000001 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16: 16 mm Solid carbon core with a Solid-span carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 8.25 oz against 8.5 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (118 vs 120) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads on softness by 16 points; everything else is within 10 points. At $280 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: Gearbox Pro Integra Power 16 and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.