Franklin Signature Carbon STR vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Franklin Signature Carbon STR

Franklin

Signature Carbon STR

80$110
Full review →
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk

Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

87$332.99
Full review →

Quick answer

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 edges it on the overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 79.8), but the two split the scored categories — pick on the one trait you care about most.

Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 · $332.99 · IQ 87.1

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 76Power95
  • 83Control84
  • 80Spin91
  • 85Forgiveness88
  • 86Sweet spot89
  • 78Stability92
  • 82Maneuverability66
  • 76Pop90
  • 79Touch80
  • 81Consistency85
  • 54Swing weight82
  • 72Twist weight92
  • 63Launch angle58
  • 64Plow through93
  • 82Softness72

Franklin Signature Carbon STR vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the Franklin Signature Carbon STR and the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16.
SpecFranklin Signature Carbon STRSelkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Street price(USD)$110 — better$332.99
IQ score(/ 100)79.887.1 — better
Weight(oz)88.25
Core thickness(mm)1616
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster110118
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable67.2 — better
Shapestandardelongated
Face length(in)1616.5
Face width(in)7.97.45
Handle length(in)55.8
Grip circumference(in)4.254.25
SurfaceRaw carbonMultistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit
Core materialPolymer honeycombBoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring

Franklin Signature Carbon STR verdict

Franklin's most credible performance paddle to date. It will not win a spin shootout, but the balance and build quality are honest for the money.

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict

The highest power score in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is plow through: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 93 against 64 for Franklin Signature Carbon STR — a 29-point gap. They are effectively level on forgiveness, sweet spot, control, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Franklin Signature Carbon STR is $222.99 cheaper at $110.

  • Plow through

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 29 points (93 vs 64).

  • Swing weight

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 28 points (82 vs 54).

  • Twist weight

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 20 points (92 vs 72).

  • Power

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 19 points (95 vs 76).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — twist weight 92 vs 72, stability 92 vs 78, forgiveness 88 vs 85. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Twist weight
  • Stability
  • Forgiveness
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Narrow

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — power 95 vs 76, spin 91 vs 80, forgiveness 88 vs 85. At 118 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.

  • Power
  • Spin
  • Forgiveness
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — plow through 93 vs 64, power 95 vs 76, spin 91 vs 80. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.

  • Plow through
  • Power
  • Spin
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Toss-up

Too close to call on the traits that matter here (81 vs 80 on the weighted index). Take Franklin Signature Carbon STR and keep the $222.99.

  • Softness

Which one should you buy?

Franklin Signature Carbon STR

Take Franklin Signature Carbon STR if you want maneuverability (+16), softness (+10), launch angle (+5). Its swing weight of 110 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Franklin Signature Carbon STR review →

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want plow through (+29), swing weight (+28), twist weight (+20). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →

Franklin Signature Carbon STR vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ

Which is better, the Franklin Signature Carbon STR or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 79.8), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — plow through — Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 29 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Franklin Signature Carbon STR, at 110 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the Franklin Signature Carbon STR or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 76 for Franklin Signature Carbon STR. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 84 versus 83. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 91 for spin off its Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face, against 80 for the Raw carbon face on Franklin Signature Carbon STR. In practice an 11-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 85). Its 7.2 twist weight against 6 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
Is the price difference worth it?
Franklin Signature Carbon STR costs $110, $222.99 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
Franklin Signature Carbon STR: 16 mm Polymer honeycomb core with a Raw carbon face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Franklin Signature Carbon STR rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Franklin Signature Carbon STR at 8 oz against 8.25 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (110 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Franklin Signature Carbon STR to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads on plow through by 29 points; everything else is within 28 points. At $110 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put Franklin Signature Carbon STR and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: Franklin Signature Carbon STR and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.