Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.

Add a third paddle to this comparison →

Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro

Franklin

Ben Johns Signature Pro

75$60
Full review →
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk

Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

87$332.99
Full review →

Quick answer

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes power, spin, control and forgiveness on Paddle DNA against the Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro, which costs $60.

Overall pick: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 · $332.99 · IQ 87.1

Paddle DNA head-to-head

  • 70Power95
  • 78Control84
  • 66Spin91
  • 84Forgiveness88
  • 86Sweet spot89
  • 72Stability92
  • 86Maneuverability66
  • 74Pop90
  • 72Touch80
  • 76Consistency85
  • 46Swing weight82
  • 64Twist weight92
  • 69Launch angle58
  • 54Plow through93
  • 78Softness72

Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 specs

Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.

Head-to-head specification comparison of the Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro and the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16.
SpecFranklin Ben Johns Signature ProSelkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16
Street price(USD)$60 — better$332.99
IQ score(/ 100)74.787.1 — better
Weight(oz)7.78.25
Core thickness(mm)1316
Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster104118
Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable5.67.2 — better
Shapestandardelongated
Face length(in)15.816.5
Face width(in)87.45
Handle length(in)4.95.8
Grip circumference(in)4.1254.25
SurfaceTextured fiberglassMultistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit
Core materialPolymer honeycombBoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring

Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro verdict

A starter paddle with a famous name on it. Perfectly serviceable for the first few months of play, and easy to hand down once you upgrade.

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 verdict

The highest power score in the database, and the twist weight (7.2) to back it up. The MOI tuning system lets you dial the balance, but nothing turns a 118 swing weight into a fast-hands paddle.

The verdict

Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is plow through: Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 93 against 54 for Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro — a 39-point gap. They are effectively level on sweet spot, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro is $272.99 cheaper at $60.

  • Plow through

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 39 points (93 vs 54).

  • Swing weight

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 36 points (82 vs 46).

  • Twist weight

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 28 points (92 vs 64).

  • Power

    Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 25 points (95 vs 70).

Which one is right for your level?

Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.

Beginner

New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — twist weight 92 vs 64, stability 92 vs 72, consistency 85 vs 76. Twist weight 7.2 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.

  • Twist weight
  • Stability
  • Consistency
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Intermediate

3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — spin 91 vs 66, power 95 vs 70, control 84 vs 78. At 118 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.

  • Spin
  • Power
  • Control
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Advanced / tournament

4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles

Clear win

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the clearer pick at this level — plow through 93 vs 54, power 95 vs 70, spin 91 vs 66. Swing weight 118 kg·cm² is what carries that through contact.

  • Plow through
  • Power
  • Spin
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Arm-sensitive players

Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load

Narrow

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is a narrow pick at this level — twist weight 92 vs 64, forgiveness 88 vs 84. Its 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core at 8.25 oz is the softer, lower-shock build of the two.

  • Twist weight
  • Forgiveness
See the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Which one should you buy?

Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro

Take Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro if you want maneuverability (+20), launch angle (+11), softness (+6). Its swing weight of 104 kg·cm² and 13 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro review →

Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16

Take Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 if you want plow through (+39), swing weight (+36), twist weight (+28). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.

Read the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 review →

Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro vs Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 FAQ

Which is better, the Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (87.1 vs 74.7), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — plow through — Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads by 39 points.
Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro, at 104 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
Which paddle has more power, the Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro or the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 95 for power against 70 for Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro. That comes from a 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core swinging at 118 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
Which one gives more control and touch?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 at 84 versus 78. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
Which paddle spins the ball more?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 scores 91 for spin off its Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face, against 66 for the Textured fiberglass face on Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro. In practice a 25-point gap is noticeable on third-shot drives.
Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, with the higher forgiveness score (88 vs 84). Its 7.2 twist weight against 5.6 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
Is the price difference worth it?
Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro costs $60, $272.99 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
Do they use the same core and face?
Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro: 13 mm Polymer honeycomb core with a Textured fiberglass face. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16: 16 mm BoomCore PureFoam with EVA Power Ring core with a Multistrata T700 carbon with InfiniGrit face.
Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16, at 5.8 in of handle against 4.9 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 avoids.
Which one is better for beginners?
Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 88 and sweet spot 89 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
Which is lighter in the hand?
Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro at 7.7 oz against 8.25 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (104 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
Is it worth upgrading from the Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro to the Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16?
Only if you need what it actually adds. Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 leads on plow through by 39 points; everything else is within 36 points. At $60 vs $332.99, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.

Also worth comparing

Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.

Top alternatives to both

Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.

Guides featuring these paddles

Still deciding? These buying guides put Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16 in context against the rest of the database.

Read the full reviews: Franklin Ben Johns Signature Pro and Selkirk Labs Project Boomstik Elongated 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.