Electrum Model E Max V3 vs HEAD Extreme Tour 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Electrum Model E Max V3 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
HEAD Extreme Tour 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes hand speed and value on Paddle DNA against the Electrum Model E Max V3, which costs $200.
Power
Too close to call
84 vs 82
Spin
Too close to call
86 vs 86
Control
88 vs 84
Forgiveness
Too close to call
86 vs 86
Hand speed
113 vs 118 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
$180 at IQ 83.7 vs $200 at IQ 84.7
Overall pick: HEAD Extreme Tour 16 · $180 · IQ 83.7
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 82Power84
- 88Control84
- 86Spin86
- 86Forgiveness86
- 88Sweet spot86
- 86Stability86
- 72Maneuverability76
- 74Pop82
- 86Touch80
- 88Consistency84
- 78Swing weight74
- 84Twist weight82
- 50Launch angle54
- 82Plow through84
- 78Softness76
Electrum Model E Max V3 vs HEAD Extreme Tour 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | Electrum Model E Max V3 | HEAD Extreme Tour 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $200 | $180 — better |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 84.7 — better | 83.7 |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 16 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 118 | 113 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.9 — better | 6.6 |
| Shape | elongated | elongated |
| Face length(in) | 16.5 | 16.4 |
| Face width(in) | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.4 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.25 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw Toray T700 carbon | Textured carbon fiber |
| Core material | Polypropylene honeycomb with foam perimeter | Comfort polymer honeycomb |
Electrum Model E Max V3 verdict
The Max is the widest-body Electrum yet, and the numbers show it: sweet spot 88 and twist weight 84 are both top-quartile. It is a forgiving elongated paddle, which is not a common combination.
HEAD Extreme Tour 16 verdict
HEAD's most balanced pickleball build yet. Nothing spikes, but nothing drops below 74 either — a dependable tournament paddle for players who dislike surprises.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is pop: HEAD Extreme Tour 16 scores 82 against 74 for Electrum Model E Max V3 — an 8-point gap. They are effectively level on power, sweet spot, twist weight, so those traits should not decide the purchase. HEAD Extreme Tour 16 is $20 cheaper at $180.
Pop
HEAD Extreme Tour 16 leads by 8 points (82 vs 74).
Touch
Electrum Model E Max V3 leads by 6 points (86 vs 80).
Control
Electrum Model E Max V3 leads by 4 points (88 vs 84).
Maneuverability
HEAD Extreme Tour 16 leads by 4 points (76 vs 72).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.6 vs 84.9 on the weighted index). Take HEAD Extreme Tour 16 and keep the $20.
- Consistency
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83.6 vs 82.7 on the weighted index). Take HEAD Extreme Tour 16 and keep the $20.
- Touch
- Control
- Consistency
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (83 vs 82.8 on the weighted index). Take HEAD Extreme Tour 16 and keep the $20.
- Touch
- Control
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (81.3 vs 79.8 on the weighted index). Take HEAD Extreme Tour 16 and keep the $20.
- Softness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
Electrum Model E Max V3
Take Electrum Model E Max V3 if you want touch (+6), control (+4), consistency (+4). Its swing weight of 118 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Electrum Model E Max V3 review →HEAD Extreme Tour 16
Take HEAD Extreme Tour 16 if you want pop (+8), maneuverability (+4), launch angle (+4). Its swing weight of 113 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the HEAD Extreme Tour 16 review →Electrum Model E Max V3 vs HEAD Extreme Tour 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the Electrum Model E Max V3 or the HEAD Extreme Tour 16?
- Electrum Model E Max V3 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (84.7 vs 83.7), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — pop — HEAD Extreme Tour 16 leads by 8 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- HEAD Extreme Tour 16, at 113 kg·cm² swing weight against 118 for Electrum Model E Max V3. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Electrum Model E Max V3 or the HEAD Extreme Tour 16?
- HEAD Extreme Tour 16 scores 84 for power against 82 for Electrum Model E Max V3. That comes from a 16 mm Comfort polymer honeycomb core swinging at 113 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Electrum Model E Max V3 at 88 versus 84. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 86 for spin.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both score 86 on forgiveness despite twist weights of 6.9 and 6.6.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- HEAD Extreme Tour 16 costs $180, $20 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on whether you actually use the traits it trades away — check the head-to-head DNA bars above before paying up.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Electrum Model E Max V3: 16 mm Polypropylene honeycomb with foam perimeter core with a Raw Toray T700 carbon face. HEAD Extreme Tour 16: 16 mm Comfort polymer honeycomb core with a Textured carbon fiber face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Electrum Model E Max V3, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.4 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Electrum Model E Max V3 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Electrum Model E Max V3 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 86 and sweet spot 88 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. HEAD Extreme Tour 16 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- HEAD Extreme Tour 16 at 8.2 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (113 vs 118) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the HEAD Extreme Tour 16 to the Electrum Model E Max V3?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. HEAD Extreme Tour 16 leads on pop by 8 points; everything else is within 6 points. At $200 vs $180, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- Model E Max V3 vs Pursuit Pro EX 16
- Model E Max V3 vs Double Black Diamond Control V2
- Model E Max V3 vs Mach 1 Forza 16
- Model E Max V3 vs Vanguard 2.0 Invikta
- Extreme Tour 16 vs R3 Pulsar
- Extreme Tour 16 vs V7 Pro 16
- Extreme Tour 16 vs Mach 2 Forza 16
- Extreme Tour 16 vs Mod TA-15 3S 16
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put Electrum Model E Max V3 and HEAD Extreme Tour 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: Electrum Model E Max V3 and HEAD Extreme Tour 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.