CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Selkirk OMNI 16
Both paddles measured on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA test. Selkirk OMNI 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 90Power89
- 87Control92
- 93Spin88
- 84Forgiveness90
- 86Sweet spot91
- 87Stability90
- 70Maneuverability74
- 81Pop84
- 86Touch90
- 88Consistency91
- 83Swing weight76
- 82Twist weight89
- 57Launch angle54
- 88Plow through85
- 88Softness86
Specs
| $280 | Price | $280 |
|---|---|---|
| 14 mm | Core | 16 mm |
| 8.3 oz | Weight | 8.1 oz |
| 116 | Swing weight | 115 |
| 6.5 | Twist weight | 6.9 |
| hybrid | Shape | hybrid |
| Raw T700 carbon | Surface | Raw carbon |
| 5.5 in | Handle | 5.5 in |
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 verdict
The hybrid sits between the other two Genesis shapes on every measured axis. If you cannot decide between reach and forgiveness, this is the shape that refuses to make you choose.
Selkirk OMNI 16 verdict
Selkirk's answer to the foam era, and the most balanced paddle they have built. The OMNI refuses to specialize: power and control both sit in the top decile, which is rare and expensive.
The verdict
Measured on the same 15-trait test, the clearest separation is swing weight: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 scores 83 against 76 for Selkirk OMNI 16 — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on stability, pop, consistency, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Price is close enough ($280 vs $280) that it should not break the tie.
Swing weight
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 leads by 7 points (83 vs 76).
Twist weight
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 7 points (89 vs 82).
Forgiveness
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 6 points (90 vs 84).
Control
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 5 points (92 vs 87).
Which one should you buy?
Selkirk OMNI 16
Take Selkirk OMNI 16 if you want twist weight (+7), forgiveness (+6), control (+5). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk OMNI 16 review →CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3
Take CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 if you want swing weight (+7), spin (+5). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 review →Selkirk OMNI 16 vs CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 FAQ
- Which is better, the Selkirk OMNI 16 or the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88.7 vs 85.9), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 leads by 7 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, at 115 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the Selkirk OMNI 16 or the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 measures 90 on power against 89 for Selkirk OMNI 16. That comes from a 14 mm TruFoam full-foam core core swinging at 116 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 at 92 versus 87. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 scores 93 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 88 for the Raw carbon face on Selkirk OMNI 16. In practice a 5-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, with 6.9 twist weight against 6.5. Higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle, and Selkirk OMNI 16 carries the higher forgiveness score (90) as a result.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- They are within $0 of each other, so price should not decide this matchup.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- Selkirk OMNI 16: 16 mm Full EVA foam core core with a Raw carbon face. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3: 14 mm TruFoam full-foam core core with a Raw T700 carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, at 5.5 in of handle against 5.5 in. Anything under 5.25 in forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel, which Selkirk OMNI 16 avoids.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel unstable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 at 8.1 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (115 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 to the Selkirk OMNI 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 leads on swing weight by 7 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $280 vs $280, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs TruFoam Genesis X
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Pegasus Gen 3
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Nova R1
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs CRBN-1X
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Read the full reviews: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 and Selkirk OMNI 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.