CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Selkirk OMNI 16
Both paddles are scored using the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model. Selkirk OMNI 16 takes the higher overall IQ score, but the right pick depends on which traits you value.
Add a third paddle to this comparison →
Quick answer
Selkirk OMNI 16 wins this matchup for most players: it takes control and forgiveness on Paddle DNA against the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3, which costs $280.
Power
Too close to call
90 vs 89
Spin
93 vs 88
Control
92 vs 87
Forgiveness
90 vs 84
Hand speed
Too close to call
115 vs 116 kg·cm² swing weight
Value
Too close to call
$280 at IQ 88.7 vs $280 at IQ 85.9
Overall pick: Selkirk OMNI 16 · $280 · IQ 88.7
Paddle DNA head-to-head
- 90Power89
- 87Control92
- 93Spin88
- 84Forgiveness90
- 86Sweet spot91
- 87Stability90
- 70Maneuverability74
- 81Pop84
- 86Touch90
- 88Consistency91
- 83Swing weight76
- 82Twist weight89
- 57Launch angle54
- 88Plow through85
- 88Softness86
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Selkirk OMNI 16 specs
Every spec side by side. Highlighted values are the better of the two where one is objectively better.
| Spec | CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 | Selkirk OMNI 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Street price(USD) | $280 | $280 |
| IQ score(/ 100) | 85.9 | 88.7 — better |
| Weight(oz) | 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Core thickness(mm) | 14 | 16 |
| Swing weight(kg·cm²)Lower swings faster | 116 | 115 |
| Twist weight(kg·cm²)Higher is more stable | 6.5 | 6.9 — better |
| Shape | hybrid | hybrid |
| Face length(in) | 16.3 | 16.4 |
| Face width(in) | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| Handle length(in) | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| Grip circumference(in) | 4.125 | 4.25 |
| Surface | Raw T700 carbon | Raw carbon |
| Core material | TruFoam full-foam core | Full EVA foam core |
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 verdict
The hybrid sits between the other two Genesis shapes on every scored axis. If you cannot decide between reach and forgiveness, this is the shape that refuses to make you choose.
Selkirk OMNI 16 verdict
Selkirk's answer to the foam era, and the most balanced paddle they have built. The OMNI refuses to specialize: power and control both sit in the top decile, which is rare and expensive.
The verdict
Scored on the same 15-trait Paddle DNA model, the clearest separation is swing weight: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 scores 83 against 76 for Selkirk OMNI 16 — a 7-point gap. They are effectively level on stability, pop, consistency, so those traits should not decide the purchase. Both sell for $280, so price cannot break the tie.
Swing weight
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 leads by 7 points (83 vs 76).
Twist weight
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 7 points (89 vs 82).
Forgiveness
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 6 points (90 vs 84).
Control
Selkirk OMNI 16 leads by 5 points (92 vs 87).
Which one is right for your level?
Each call below re-weights the Paddle DNA traits that matter at that level, so the winner can differ from the overall pick.
Beginner
New to 3.0 — still building a consistent contact point
Selkirk OMNI 16
Selkirk OMNI 16 is a narrow pick at this level — forgiveness 90 vs 84, sweet spot 91 vs 86, twist weight 89 vs 82. Twist weight 6.9 keeps the face steadier on off-centre contact.
- Forgiveness
- Sweet spot
- Twist weight
Intermediate
3.0–3.9 — playing organised rec and early tournaments
Selkirk OMNI 16
Selkirk OMNI 16 is a narrow pick at this level — control 92 vs 87, forgiveness 90 vs 84, maneuverability 74 vs 70. At 115 kg·cm² swing weight it stays quick enough for hands battles.
- Control
- Forgiveness
- Maneuverability
Advanced / tournament
4.0+ — repeatable swing, fast hands battles
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (86.8 vs 86.8 on the weighted index). Pick on static weight — 8.3 oz on the TruFoam Genesis 3, 8.1 oz on the OMNI 16.
- Touch
- Control
- Maneuverability
Arm-sensitive players
Anyone managing tennis elbow or shoulder load
Too close to call on the traits that matter here (85.8 vs 87.6 on the weighted index). Pick on static weight — 8.3 oz on the TruFoam Genesis 3, 8.1 oz on the OMNI 16.
- Forgiveness
- Twist weight
Which one should you buy?
CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3
Take CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 if you want swing weight (+7), spin (+5). Its swing weight of 116 kg·cm² and 14 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 review →Selkirk OMNI 16
Take Selkirk OMNI 16 if you want twist weight (+7), forgiveness (+6), control (+5). Its swing weight of 115 kg·cm² and 16 mm core are what produce that profile.
Read the Selkirk OMNI 16 review →CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Selkirk OMNI 16 FAQ
- Which is better, the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 or the Selkirk OMNI 16?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 carries the higher overall Paddle IQ score (88.7 vs 85.9), but IQ is a weighted average. On the trait that separates them most — swing weight — CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 leads by 7 points.
- Which one is faster at the kitchen line?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, at 115 kg·cm² swing weight against 116 for CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3. Lower swing weight is the single best predictor of hand speed in fast exchanges.
- Which paddle has more power, the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 or the Selkirk OMNI 16?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 scores 90 for power against 89 for Selkirk OMNI 16. That comes from a 14 mm TruFoam full-foam core swinging at 116 kg·cm² — mass behind the ball, not face material.
- Which one gives more control and touch?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 at 92 versus 87. Its 16 mm core holds the ball on the face slightly longer, which is what makes resets and dinks land shorter.
- Which paddle spins the ball more?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 scores 93 for spin off its Raw T700 carbon face, against 88 for the Raw carbon face on Selkirk OMNI 16. In practice a 5-point gap is small enough that technique matters more.
- Which is more forgiving on off-center hits?
- Selkirk OMNI 16, with the higher forgiveness score (90 vs 84). Its 6.9 twist weight against 6.5 is what drives it — higher twist weight means the face rotates less when you miss the middle.
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Both list at $280. Too close to call — neither has an advantage here.
- Do they use the same core and face?
- CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3: 14 mm TruFoam full-foam core with a Raw T700 carbon face. Selkirk OMNI 16: 16 mm Full EVA foam core with a Raw carbon face.
- Which is better for a two-handed backhand?
- Too close to call — neither has an advantage here. Both run a 5.5 in handle, long enough that neither forces you to choke the bottom hand onto the face bevel.
- Which one is better for beginners?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 is the safer first paddle here: forgiveness 90 and sweet spot 91 mean fewer mishits while your contact point is still inconsistent. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 rewards a repeatable swing and can feel less stable before that.
- Which is lighter in the hand?
- Selkirk OMNI 16 at 8.1 oz against 8.3 oz. Static weight matters for arm fatigue and elbow comfort; swing weight (115 vs 116) is what you feel mid-rally.
- Is it worth upgrading from the CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 to the Selkirk OMNI 16?
- Only if you need what it actually adds. CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 leads on swing weight by 7 points; everything else is within 7 points. At $280 vs $280, the money is better spent elsewhere unless that one trait is your weak spot.
Related comparisons
The other matchups shoppers open in the same session as this one.
Also worth comparing
Head-to-heads that share DNA with this matchup — useful if you're still deciding between shapes, cores or price tiers.
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs TruFoam Genesis X
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Pegasus Gen 3
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs Nova R1
- TruFoam Genesis 3 vs CRBN-1X
Top alternatives to both
Paddles that beat one of these two on a specific trait or on price.
Guides featuring these paddles
Still deciding? These buying guides put CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 and Selkirk OMNI 16 in context against the rest of the database.
Read the full reviews: CRBN TruFoam Genesis 3 and Selkirk OMNI 16. Or build a different comparison, browse the full database or find paddles within 5% of your current one.